# 0.19.8 Released

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/0-19-8-released/8287>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [July 2, 2012, 8:27pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/0-19-8-released/8287 "2012-07-02T20:27:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 8:27pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/0-19-8-released/8287/1 "2012-07-02T20:27:01Z")

</div>

Heya,

0.19.8 has just been released, including another round of bug fixes, and  
some minor (though useful) features. More info here:  
[http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/2012/07/02/0.19.8-released.html](http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/2012/07/02/0.19.8-released.html).

-shay.banon

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ahsin01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/779978/32.png) [@ahsin01](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/ahsin01)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2012, 10:17pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/0-19-8-released/8287/2 "2012-07-02T22:17:48Z")

</div>

Hi Shay, I just got 0.19.8 and I had downloaded 0.19.4 previously.  
When I checked the lib, I found lucene jars of 3.6.0 included in 0.19.8 have less size compared to the jars included in 0.19.4. Do you still use Lucene lib 3.6.0 in this build?

Thanks.

Alan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 3:21am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/0-19-8-released/8287/3 "2017-07-06T03:21:45Z")

</div>