# 100% processor usage

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [August 15, 2012, 3:10pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749 "2012-08-15T15:10:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marcin\_Dojwa](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/marcin_dojwa/32/2307_2.png) [@Marcin\_Dojwa](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Marcin_Dojwa)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 8:30pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/21 "2012-10-03T20:30:10Z")

</div>

But executing a single delete by query I use 1 alias per query.

W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Marcin Dojwa napisał:

> More, I have 1 index and about 50000 aliases to this index.
> 
> W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen napisał:
> 
> > Hi Marcin,
> > 
> > Are you using one or more aliases when executing the delete by query?
> > 
> > Martijn
> > 
> > On 3 October 2012 10:50, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > The exact mapping is here: [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/bbde44039b20a57eebf0)  
> > > I guess that this is about chat document type because this is the only  
> > > one with nested mapping. I can not give you exact data that could possibly  
> > > cause such a situation because this is our clients' private data. Are you  
> > > able to try reproduce the problem with this information about mapping only?  
> > > If not I will try to prepare fake example data.
> > > 
> > > Best regards.
> > > 
> > > 2012/10/2 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > 
> > > It seems like its doing the delete by query with nested documents. Can  
> > > you share your mapping, and sample data that you index, and the  
> > > delete\_by\_query that you are using?
> > > 
> > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I attached 4 different (I think) snapshots of curl  
> > > localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads here:  
> > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/f2826104eb5b288d3fb0)
> > > 
> > > Best regards.  
> > > Marcin Dojwa
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/29 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > 
> > > Sure, I will try to reproduce this case on Monday. I updated ES to  
> > > 0.19.9 so I will check if this happens with this version too.
> > > 
> > > Best regards.
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/28 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > 
> > > Can you issue: curl localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads and gist the  
> > > response?
> > > 
> > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > One one thing, I am not sure if it hangs on bulk indexing or on 'delete  
> > > by query' after bulk indexing.
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > 
> > > Fix for 1.: each bulk has 10000 inserts
> > > 
> > > Best regards.
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > 
> > > Oh, and there is nothing in gc log.
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > 
> > > I am using ES 0.19.8, I want to upgrade to 0.19.9 now but I am not sure  
> > > if that will help.
> > > 
> > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I still need help in this 🙂 I have the following information:
> > > 
> > > 1. 2 nodes (es1 and es2)
> > > 2. 1 index Users with 30 shards and 1 replica
> > > 
> > > I do the following:
> > > 
> > > 1. On es2 I run consecutively many bulk index operations (each bulk has  
> > > 1000 inserts) and I do about 1000 such bulk inserts.
> > > 2. At some point of inserting es1 uses about 300% of processor and bulk
> > > 
> > > --
> > 
> > --  
> > Met vriendelijke groet,
> > 
> > Martijn van Groningen
> > 
> > --

--

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mvg](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/mvg/32/98890_2.png) [@mvg](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/mvg)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 9:45pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/22 "2012-10-03T21:45:39Z")

</div>

I found out that the delete by query basically hangs when executed  
with an alias that has a filter associated with it.  
If you run the delete by query on the concrete index, it should work.  
I'll open an issue for this.

Martijn

On 3 October 2012 22:30, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:

> But executing a single delete by query I use 1 alias per query.
> 
> W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Marcin Dojwa napisał:
> 
> > More, I have 1 index and about 50000 aliases to this index.
> > 
> > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen napisał:
> > 
> > > Hi Marcin,
> > > 
> > > Are you using one or more aliases when executing the delete by query?
> > > 
> > > Martijn
> > > 
> > > On 3 October 2012 10:50, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > The exact mapping is here: [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/bbde44039b20a57eebf0)  
> > > > I guess that this is about chat document type because this is the only  
> > > > one with nested mapping. I can not give you exact data that could possibly  
> > > > cause such a situation because this is our clients' private data. Are you  
> > > > able to try reproduce the problem with this information about mapping only?  
> > > > If not I will try to prepare fake example data.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/10/2 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > 
> > > > It seems like its doing the delete by query with nested documents. Can  
> > > > you share your mapping, and sample data that you index, and the  
> > > > delete\_by\_query that you are using?
> > > > 
> > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I attached 4 different (I think) snapshots of curl  
> > > > localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads here:  
> > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/f2826104eb5b288d3fb0)
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards.  
> > > > Marcin Dojwa
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/29 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > 
> > > > Sure, I will try to reproduce this case on Monday. I updated ES to  
> > > > 0.19.9 so I will check if this happens with this version too.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/28 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > 
> > > > Can you issue: curl localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads and gist the  
> > > > response?
> > > > 
> > > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > One one thing, I am not sure if it hangs on bulk indexing or on 'delete  
> > > > by query' after bulk indexing.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > 
> > > > Fix for 1.: each bulk has 10000 inserts
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > 
> > > > Oh, and there is nothing in gc log.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > 
> > > > I am using ES 0.19.8, I want to upgrade to 0.19.9 now but I am not sure  
> > > > if that will help.
> > > > 
> > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I still need help in this 🙂 I have the following information:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. 2 nodes (es1 and es2)
> > > > 2. 1 index Users with 30 shards and 1 replica
> > > > 
> > > > I do the following:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. On es2 I run consecutively many bulk index operations (each bulk has  
> > > > 1000 inserts) and I do about 1000 such bulk inserts.
> > > > 2. At some point of inserting es1 uses about 300% of processor and bulk
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > 
> > > --  
> > > Met vriendelijke groet,
> > > 
> > > Martijn van Groningen
> > > 
> > > --
> 
> --

--  
Met vriendelijke groet,

Martijn van Groningen

--

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marcin\_Dojwa](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/marcin_dojwa/32/2307_2.png) [@Marcin\_Dojwa](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Marcin_Dojwa)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 4:53am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/23 "2012-10-04T04:53:13Z")

</div>

That would solve my problem, I will check this out today. Thanks.

W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen napisał:

> I found out that the delete by query basically hangs when executed  
> with an alias that has a filter associated with it.  
> If you run the delete by query on the concrete index, it should work.  
> I'll open an issue for this.
> 
> Martijn
> 
> On 3 October 2012 22:30, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> 
> > But executing a single delete by query I use 1 alias per query.
> > 
> > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Marcin Dojwa napisał:
> > 
> > > More, I have 1 index and about 50000 aliases to this index.
> > > 
> > > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen  
> > > napisał:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Marcin,
> > > > 
> > > > Are you using one or more aliases when executing the delete by query?
> > > > 
> > > > Martijn
> > > > 
> > > > On 3 October 2012 10:50, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The exact mapping is here:  
> > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/bbde44039b20a57eebf0)  
> > > > > I guess that this is about chat document type because this is the only  
> > > > > one with nested mapping. I can not give you exact data that could  
> > > > > possibly  
> > > > > cause such a situation because this is our clients' private data. Are  
> > > > > you  
> > > > > able to try reproduce the problem with this information about mapping  
> > > > > only?  
> > > > > If not I will try to prepare fake example data.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/10/2 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > It seems like its doing the delete by query with nested documents. Can  
> > > > > you share your mapping, and sample data that you index, and the  
> > > > > delete\_by\_query that you are using?
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I attached 4 different (I think) snapshots of curl  
> > > > > localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads here:  
> > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/f2826104eb5b288d3fb0)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards.  
> > > > > Marcin Dojwa
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/29 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sure, I will try to reproduce this case on Monday. I updated ES to  
> > > > > 0.19.9 so I will check if this happens with this version too.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/28 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can you issue: curl localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads and gist the  
> > > > > response?
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > One one thing, I am not sure if it hangs on bulk indexing or on  
> > > > > 'delete  
> > > > > by query' after bulk indexing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix for 1.: each bulk has 10000 inserts
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oh, and there is nothing in gc log.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am using ES 0.19.8, I want to upgrade to 0.19.9 now but I am not  
> > > > > sure  
> > > > > if that will help.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa \<

--

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marcin\_Dojwa](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/marcin_dojwa/32/2307_2.png) [@Marcin\_Dojwa](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Marcin_Dojwa)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 10:25am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/24 "2012-10-04T10:25:29Z")

</div>

You were right Martijn, it works fine since I replace an alias with exact  
index name. Thank you.

Best regards.

2012/10/4 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)

> That would solve my problem, I will check this out today. Thanks.
> 
> W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen napisał:
> 
> > I found out that the delete by query basically hangs when executed  
> > with an alias that has a filter associated with it.  
> > If you run the delete by query on the concrete index, it should work.  
> > I'll open an issue for this.
> > 
> > Martijn
> > 
> > On 3 October 2012 22:30, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > But executing a single delete by query I use 1 alias per query.
> > > 
> > > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Marcin Dojwa napisał:
> > > 
> > > > More, I have 1 index and about 50000 aliases to this index.
> > > > 
> > > > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen  
> > > > napisał:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Marcin,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Are you using one or more aliases when executing the delete by query?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Martijn
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 3 October 2012 10:50, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The exact mapping is here:  
> > > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/bbde44039b20a57eebf0)  
> > > > > > I guess that this is about chat document type because this is the  
> > > > > > only  
> > > > > > one with nested mapping. I can not give you exact data that could  
> > > > > > possibly  
> > > > > > cause such a situation because this is our clients' private data.  
> > > > > > Are you  
> > > > > > able to try reproduce the problem with this information about  
> > > > > > mapping only?  
> > > > > > If not I will try to prepare fake example data.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/10/2 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It seems like its doing the delete by query with nested documents.  
> > > > > > Can  
> > > > > > you share your mapping, and sample data that you index, and the  
> > > > > > delete\_by\_query that you are using?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I attached 4 different (I think) snapshots of curl  
> > > > > > localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads here:  
> > > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/f2826104eb5b288d3fb0)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best regards.  
> > > > > > Marcin Dojwa
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/29 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sure, I will try to reproduce this case on Monday. I updated ES to  
> > > > > > 0.19.9 so I will check if this happens with this version too.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/28 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Can you issue: curl localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads and gist the  
> > > > > > response?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > One one thing, I am not sure if it hangs on bulk indexing or on  
> > > > > > 'delete  
> > > > > > by query' after bulk indexing.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Fix for 1.: each bulk has 10000 inserts
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Oh, and there is nothing in gc log.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am using ES 0.19.8, I want to upgrade to 0.19.9 now but I am not  
> > > > > > sure  
> > > > > > if that will help.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa \<

--

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mvg](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/mvg/32/98890_2.png) [@mvg](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/mvg)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 11:18am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/25 "2012-10-04T11:18:22Z")

</div>

Thanks for verifying this Marcin.

Martijn

On 4 October 2012 12:25, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:

> You were right Martijn, it works fine since I replace an alias with exact  
> index name. Thank you.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 2012/10/4 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> 
> > That would solve my problem, I will check this out today. Thanks.
> > 
> > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen napisał:
> > 
> > > I found out that the delete by query basically hangs when executed  
> > > with an alias that has a filter associated with it.  
> > > If you run the delete by query on the concrete index, it should work.  
> > > I'll open an issue for this.
> > > 
> > > Martijn
> > > 
> > > On 3 October 2012 22:30, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com) wrote:
> > > 
> > > > But executing a single delete by query I use 1 alias per query.
> > > > 
> > > > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Marcin Dojwa napisał:
> > > > 
> > > > > More, I have 1 index and about 50000 aliases to this index.
> > > > > 
> > > > > W dniu środa, 3 października 2012 użytkownik Martijn v Groningen  
> > > > > napisał:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Marcin,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Are you using one or more aliases when executing the delete by query?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Martijn
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 3 October 2012 10:50, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The exact mapping is here:  
> > > > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/bbde44039b20a57eebf0)  
> > > > > > > I guess that this is about chat document type because this is the  
> > > > > > > only  
> > > > > > > one with nested mapping. I can not give you exact data that could  
> > > > > > > possibly  
> > > > > > > cause such a situation because this is our clients' private data.  
> > > > > > > Are you  
> > > > > > > able to try reproduce the problem with this information about  
> > > > > > > mapping only?  
> > > > > > > If not I will try to prepare fake example data.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/10/2 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It seems like its doing the delete by query with nested documents.  
> > > > > > > Can  
> > > > > > > you share your mapping, and sample data that you index, and the  
> > > > > > > delete\_by\_query that you are using?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I attached 4 different (I think) snapshots of curl  
> > > > > > > localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads here:  
> > > > > > > [ES 100% processor usage · GitHub](https://gist.github.com/f2826104eb5b288d3fb0)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Best regards.  
> > > > > > > Marcin Dojwa
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/29 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Sure, I will try to reproduce this case on Monday. I updated ES to  
> > > > > > > 0.19.9 so I will check if this happens with this version too.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/28 Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Can you issue: curl localhost:9200/\_nodes/hot\_threads and gist the  
> > > > > > > response?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)  
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > One one thing, I am not sure if it hangs on bulk indexing or on  
> > > > > > > 'delete  
> > > > > > > by query' after bulk indexing.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Fix for 1.: each bulk has 10000 inserts
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Best regards.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Oh, and there is nothing in gc log.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa [m.dojwa@livechatinc.com](mailto:m.dojwa@livechatinc.com)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I am using ES 0.19.8, I want to upgrade to 0.19.9 now but I am not  
> > > > > > > sure  
> > > > > > > if that will help.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2012/9/27 Marcin Dojwa \<
> 
> --

--  
Met vriendelijke groet,

Martijn van Groningen

--

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 3:10am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749/26 "2017-07-06T03:10:09Z")

</div>

Closed on July 6, 2017, 3:10am UTC



[Previous page](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/100-processor-usage/8749.md?page=1)