# About indices stored size

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [September 28, 2018, 5:13am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290 "2018-09-28T05:13:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/af615dbd55cac2cacf32)
#### Post date: [September 28, 2018, 5:13am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/1 "2018-09-28T05:13:59Z")

</div>

Hello,  
My Logstash creates 17 indices daily basis, and stored size is as below.

Should I reduce Shard number for small sized indices?  
OR merge some of indices?  
_e.g. combine "access\_xpg\_prd\_20180928", "access\_ui50\_prd\_20180928" and "access\_scs\_prd\_20180928" to "access\_prd\_20180928"_

GET \_cat/indices/\*20180928?v&s=index

health status index uuid pri rep docs.count docs.deleted store.size pri.store.size  
green open access\_metv\_prd\_20180928 eGUZymINRkG4jaMzUJMmhA 6 1 1028172 0 1.5gb 778.4mb  
green open access\_ncms\_prd\_20180928 nrP-FZIYSi2E\_9Rw-KA6xA 6 1 60593 0 62.2mb 30.9mb  
green open access\_scs\_prd\_20180928 r2Wzgv4zS2Kszdr-o4XOzQ 6 1 186080 0 331.4mb 165.6mb  
green open access\_ui50\_prd\_20180928 FbGCqHQgQ2ypYtSZKADdLA 6 1 25823 0 19.8mb 9.9mb  
green open access\_xpg\_prd\_20180928 rQsZBxvWTUOCLVE9e1EunQ 6 1 1457313 0 1.8gb 959.1mb  
green open gateway\_prd\_20180928 u-cFpU3HRL6DSRx-hk\_q-Q 6 1 16299200 0 35.5gb 16.9gb  
green open metv\_prd\_metv-bookmark\_20180928 -b7T9yskSDm0uoD6b-fevQ 6 1 1023104 0 936.8mb 468.3mb  
green open metv\_prd\_metv-datamart\_20180928 tHungQ4\_QCa35oSKZ3jGoA 6 1 3562219 0 2.5gb 1.2gb  
green open metv\_prd\_metv-purchase\_20180928 GsbXY3q7QAyRyK-UPcN18A 6 1 135541 0 102.2mb 51.2mb  
green open metv\_prd\_metv-setting\_20180928 bJ7u45paSDqArEOHozuD2w 6 1 2495677 0 1.9gb 976.6mb  
green open metv\_prd\_metv-watch\_20180928 TCq8opsGToOYNy3-HRp6HA 6 1 5490844 0 4.8gb 2.3gb  
green open ncms\_prd\_ncms-api\_20180928 ALaztRz9Q7ONtyIheVK9ug 6 1 4692 0 3.1mb 1.5mb  
green open ncms\_prd\_ncms-app\_20180928 5-AcBiwpSoWcFJ4aA2FrYw 6 1 303754 0 211.7mb 105.9mb  
green open scs\_prd\_scs-gwsvc\_20180928 1y5RfTixSP-WVwA0aX0B7A 6 1 705293 0 1.4gb 738.8mb  
green open scs\_prd\_scs-purchase\_20180928 Z5uPSEiITRiwAQpI3VP4Og 6 1 645598 0 1gb 519.4mb  
green open scs\_prd\_scs-stbauth\_20180928 JdIzJvDvSA62ntHmbLQUag 6 1 2454 0 4.9mb 2.5mb  
green open scs\_prd\_scs-triggersvc\_20180928 jFXjcOd1RmyQoIiSWUXmZw 6 1 46477 0 20.5mb 10.2mb

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [September 28, 2018, 6:03am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/2 "2018-09-28T06:03:23Z")

</div>

Having lots of small shards like this [can be very inefficient](https://www.elastic.co/blog/how-many-shards-should-i-have-in-my-elasticsearch-cluster). All your shards are very small, so I do not see any need for more than a single primary shard for any of them. Merging indices is also an option. If you have a long retention period I would even recommend switching to monthly indices for the vast majority of them, even after they are combined.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/af615dbd55cac2cacf32)
#### Post date: [September 28, 2018, 10:22am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/3 "2018-09-28T10:22:43Z")

</div>

That was what i wated to heard from you to confirm. Yes we combined some of similar indices today.

Can you please advise or share the reference page how i can combine/merge old indices in warm nodes??

Thank you!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [September 28, 2018, 10:26am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/4 "2018-09-28T10:26:36Z")

</div>

You will need to use the reindex API.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@af615dbd55cac2cacf32](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/af615dbd55cac2cacf32)
#### Post date: [September 29, 2018, 12:23am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/5 "2018-09-29T00:23:35Z")

</div>

Okay I will take a look. Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [October 27, 2018, 12:23am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/about-indices-stored-size/150290/6 "2018-10-27T00:23:47Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
