# Consolidation d'événements Métier - Besoin d'appenders Elasticsearch pour Log4J2

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/consolidation-devenements-metier-besoin-dappenders-elasticsearch-pour-log4j2/28251
**Category:** Discussions en français
**Created:** [August 28, 2015, 2:21pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/consolidation-devenements-metier-besoin-dappenders-elasticsearch-pour-log4j2/28251 "2015-08-28T14:21:28Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jeff\_Contour](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/71c47a/32.png) [@Jeff\_Contour](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Jeff_Contour)
#### Post date: [August 28, 2015, 2:21pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/consolidation-devenements-metier-besoin-dappenders-elasticsearch-pour-log4j2/28251/1 "2015-08-28T14:21:28Z")

</div>

Je répond (de préférence) en français... 😀

> [@Centralizing Business Events : RFC for log4j2 appenders for Elasticsearch](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/centralizing-business-events-rfc-for-log4j2-appenders-for-elasticsearch/28250):
>
> Centralizing Business events is a very common need that could be handled much more easily and this is the subject of this "Request For Comments". I tried to make it as short as possible. wink As opposed to a technical (think log4j) event, a business event : has a potentially complexe structure should never be lost (think audit purposes) could trigger more use cases if stored asap (Watcher) There are already a few open source projects that have implemented a log4j appender for Elasticsea…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2017, 1:51pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/consolidation-devenements-metier-besoin-dappenders-elasticsearch-pour-log4j2/28251/2 "2017-07-06T13:51:13Z")

</div>


