# Distributed Facet Count Recommendations

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/distributed-facet-count-recommendations/4660
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [June 20, 2011, 1:41pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/distributed-facet-count-recommendations/4660 "2011-06-20T13:41:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jan\_Fiedler](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/jan_fiedler/32/2518_2.png) [@Jan\_Fiedler](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Jan_Fiedler)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2011, 1:41pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/distributed-facet-count-recommendations/4660/1 "2011-06-20T13:41:17Z")

</div>

I ran into the issue of incorrect counts for term facets (has been  
discusses previously in this group). I was wondering whether there are  
any recommendations how to ensure precise facet counts. I played with  
the facet size (using number of shards times desired facet size) but  
still did not get precise counts. Is there any support at the search  
type side (and if yes, what is the performance implication of such an  
approach)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2017, 4:03am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/distributed-facet-count-recommendations/4660/2 "2017-07-06T04:03:07Z")

</div>


