# Elastic Flush/fetch latency too high

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Tags:** elastic-stack-monitoring
**Created:** [November 26, 2025, 12:13pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681 "2025-11-26T12:13:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![richard2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb8c5e/32.png) [@richard2](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/richard2)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 12:13pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/1 "2025-11-26T12:13:03Z")

</div>

Hello,

from zabbix monitoring im getting a lot of notifications fetch/flush latency is too high.

Are values within a margin or is it problem. In last 12 hours avg was 5000 ms max 34000ms

Would changing durability to async fix the issue? "index.translog.durability": "async"

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/6/5/6592e81f3e90d7c93f21da782feb498db13b78ac.png)

my current settings

[elasticsearch@elasticsearch-master-0 ~]$ curl -k -u "${ELASTIC\_USERNAME}:${ELASTIC\_PASSWORD}" \

> name flush.total flush.total\_time  
> elasticsearch-master-0 2692 3.9h  
> elasticsearch-master-1 2699 4.2h  
> elasticsearch-master-2 2747 4.5h
> 
> name heap.percent heap.current heap.max ram.current ram.max  
> elasticsearch-master-0 67 5.4gb 8gb 11.9gb 12gb  
> elasticsearch-master-1 67 5.4gb 8gb 11.9gb 12gb  
> elasticsearch-master-2 46 3.7gb 8gb 11.9gb 12gb
> 
> name segments.count segments.memory merges.current  
> elasticsearch-master-0 624 28.9mb 2  
> elasticsearch-master-1 547 24.5mb 1  
> elasticsearch-master-2 579 25.6mb 1

[elasticsearch@elasticsearch-master-0 ~]$ curl -k -u "${ELASTIC\_USERNAME}:${ELASTIC\_PASSWORD}" \

> "settings?include\_defaults=true&pretty" | \  
> grep -A 5 "translog"  
> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current  
> Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed  
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ~~::~~ - - ~~::~~ - - ~~::~~ - 0 "translog" : {  
> "generation\_threshold\_size" : "64mb",  
> "flush\_threshold\_size" : "512mb",  
> "sync\_interval" : "5s",  
> "retention" : {  
> "size" : "512MB",  
> –

image: \*\*elasticsearch:7.10.1

PVC\*\* Size

4096 GiB

Storage type

Standard SSD LRS

```
      resources:

        limits:

          cpu: '2'

          memory: 12Gi

        requests:

          cpu: 100m

          memory: 4Gi

```

Thanks for help

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 12:44pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/2 "2025-11-26T12:44:49Z")

</div>

> [@richard2](#):
>
> image: \*\*elasticsearch:7.10.1

Note that this version is very old and has been EOL a very long time. I would recommend that you upgrade, ideally to the latest version.

> [@richard2](#):
>
> from zabbix monitoring im getting a lot of notifications fetch/flush latency is too high.

> [@richard2](#):
>
> Standard SSD LRS

It sounds like your storage may be too slow for your use case. I would recommend switching to faster storage and see if that resolves the issue.

> [@richard2](#):
>
> Would changing durability to async fix the issue? "index.translog.durability": "async"

It may have an impact but I do not use this setting as it reduces resiliency and does not solve the core problem, which potentially is slow storage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![richard2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb8c5e/32.png) [@richard2](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/richard2)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 1:32pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/3 "2025-11-26T13:32:49Z")

</div>

Hi,

Thanks for reply

Standard SSD have Max throughput 750 MB/s IOP 6,000  
Would Premiumv2 with 20k iops be enough?

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/a/2/a2f72fbdfb6dacdabd59b52f997d53339481663d.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 1:37pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/4 "2025-11-26T13:37:34Z")

</div>

Do you have monitoring of IOPS and disk I/O inplace? Id so, do you see any correlation with the times you are having issues?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![richard2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb8c5e/32.png) [@richard2](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/richard2)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 3:06pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/5 "2025-11-26T15:06:11Z")

</div>

From azure monitoring  
Last 4 h disk read operations avg 82.95s max 520/s

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/7/9/798cde3dd005d275e4a28e03af78bcf63a284db6.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 6:26pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/6 "2025-11-26T18:26:26Z")

</div>

I do not use Azure a lot but [it seems IOPS varies by disk size](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/disks-types#standard-ssd-size). What is the size of the disk you are using?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RainTown](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/raintown/32/140206_2.png) [@RainTown](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/RainTown)
#### Post date: [November 26, 2025, 7:21pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/7 "2025-11-26T19:21:59Z")

</div>

> [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](#):
>
> [it seems IOPS varies by disk size](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/disks-types#standard-ssd-size)

Also no real clue on Azure, but the little asterisk on the 6000 IOPS line says:

\* Only applies to disks with performance plus enabled.

Otherwise it’s 500 IOPS per disk (base) for all disk sizes according to that chart. With also pretty limited throughput.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![richard2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb8c5e/32.png) [@richard2](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/richard2)
#### Post date: [November 27, 2025, 7:53am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/8 "2025-11-27T07:53:18Z")

</div>

That makes sense, I was thinking the limit is 6000 but in the graph it was max 500.

im using size **E50** max iops is then 500.

Looks like the performance plus mode can be enabled free of charge IOPS would be 6000 throughput 600 mb/s

I will test it if it didnt help then upgrade to premium v2

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RainTown](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/raintown/32/140206_2.png) [@RainTown](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/RainTown)
#### Post date: [November 27, 2025, 8:57am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-flush-fetch-latency-too-high/383681/9 "2025-11-27T08:57:14Z")

</div>

> [@richard2](#):
>
> Looks like the performance plus mode can be enabled free of charge IOPS would be 6000 throughput 600 mb/s

Free, but with some caveats, you cannot just toggle it on for an existing disk.
