# Elasticsearch 0.17.9 vs 0.19.10 index size **URL:** \ **Category:** Elasticsearch\ **Created:** [October 3, 2012, 5:33pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233 "2012-10-03T17:33:22Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![CatalinC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9c0ed/32.png) [@CatalinC](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/CatalinC)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 5:33pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233/1 "2012-10-03T17:33:22Z")
Hi Everyone, I have upgraded my ES from 0.17.9 to 0.19.10, and I have indexed a given amount of data with both versions. In 0.19.10 the indexes are bigger....1.5 the size of 0.17.9. Any explanation? Thank you very much! Catalin -- ---
**Author:** ![otisg](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/otisg/32/492_2.png) [@otisg](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/otisg)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 8:19pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233/2 "2012-10-03T20:19:23Z")
Hi, Both have identical mappings? And both are optimized? May be best to optimize them both to make comparison fair. ## Otis Search Analytics - [Cloud Monitoring Tools & Services | Sematext](http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html) Performance Monitoring - [http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm](http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm) On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:33:22 PM UTC-4, CatalinC wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I have upgraded my ES from 0.17.9 to 0.19.10, and I have indexed a given > amount of data with both versions. In 0.19.10 the indexes are > bigger....1.5 the size of 0.17.9. Any explanation? > Thank you very much! > Catalin -- ---
**Author:** ![CatalinC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9c0ed/32.png) [@CatalinC](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/CatalinC)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 11:04pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233/3 "2012-10-03T23:04:01Z")
Yes, same mappings, and optimized. Any ideas? On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Otis Gospodnetic \<[otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com](mailto:otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com) > wrote: > Hi, > > Both have identical mappings? And both are optimized? May be best to > optimize them both to make comparison fair. > > ## Otis > > Search Analytics - [Cloud Monitoring Tools & Services | Sematext](http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html) > Performance Monitoring - [http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm](http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm) > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:33:22 PM UTC-4, CatalinC wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > I have upgraded my ES from 0.17.9 to 0.19.10, and I have indexed a given > > amount of data with both versions. In 0.19.10 the indexes are > > bigger....1.5 the size of 0.17.9. Any explanation? > > Thank you very much! > > Catalin > > -- -- ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 7:16am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233/4 "2012-10-04T07:16:51Z")
There shouldn't be a difference between the two. Can you gist your mappings? On Oct 4, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Catalin Calistru [calistrum@gmail.com](mailto:calistrum@gmail.com) wrote: > Yes, same mappings, and optimized. Any ideas? > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Otis Gospodnetic [otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com](mailto:otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > Both have identical mappings? And both are optimized? May be best to optimize them both to make comparison fair. > > ## Otis > > Search Analytics - [Cloud Monitoring Tools & Services | Sematext](http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html) > Performance Monitoring - [http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm](http://sematext.com/spm/index.htm) > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:33:22 PM UTC-4, CatalinC wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I have upgraded my ES from 0.17.9 to 0.19.10, and I have indexed a given amount of data with both versions. In 0.19.10 the indexes are bigger....1.5 the size of 0.17.9. Any explanation? > Thank you very much! > Catalin > > -- > > -- -- ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 3:10am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-0-17-9-vs-0-19-10-index-size/9233/5 "2017-07-06T03:10:12Z")
Closed on July 6, 2017, 3:10am UTC