# ELK on Windows: Very Poor Performance

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [April 18, 2017, 8:05pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769 "2017-04-18T20:05:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gokhankocak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6de8d8/32.png) [@gokhankocak](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/gokhankocak)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2017, 8:05pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769/1 "2017-04-18T20:05:49Z")

</div>

We setup a cluster with 2 data nodes on Hyper-V VMs.  
Daily index size is around 200 GB.  
Performance is very poor, elasticsearch does not respond at all.  
2 data nodes use 100% CPU and 32 GB of memory (each node).  
We use the latest version, 5.3.0 with the latest Java version.

I also observed 400 Mbit/s network traffic between nodes.

We need some guidance on sizing.  
Or should we setup Linux nodes instead of Windows?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![warkolm](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/warkolm/32/39224_2.png) [@warkolm](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/warkolm)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2017, 11:07pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769/2 "2017-04-18T23:07:01Z")

</div>

How many indices, how many shards?  
Do you have Monitoring enabled?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gokhankocak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6de8d8/32.png) [@gokhankocak](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/gokhankocak)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:17am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769/3 "2017-04-19T06:17:36Z")

</div>

Hi Mark,

Yes, we have monitoring enabled.  
There are 288 primary shards and 283 replica shards and 68 indices.  
Indices keep daily logs, so the latest one is most active.

[cid:image003.jpg@01D2B8ED.C8064620]

[cid:image004.jpg@01D2B8ED.C8064620]

[cid:image005.jpg@01D2B8ED.C8064620]

// Gökhan Koçak  
// Uygulama Yönetimi Mimari Danışmanı

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/9/6/9601dd3618f8f0fa6988c64fe64741a2eeb7dbc9.jpg)

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/f/b/fbc317137a3f9b7840c43fc5790c971061d04d74.jpg)

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/e/9/e937ac09025bc9e1dee6a00e63c7842d4d369420.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2017, 6:25am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elk-on-windows-very-poor-performance/82769/4 "2017-05-17T06:25:58Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
