# If Elasticsearch 1.0.0.RC1 is a release candidate, can we have matching docs?

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/if-elasticsearch-1-0-0-rc1-is-a-release-candidate-can-we-have-matching-docs/15352>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [January 22, 2014, 10:08am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/if-elasticsearch-1-0-0-rc1-is-a-release-candidate-can-we-have-matching-docs/15352 "2014-01-22T10:08:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jminard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/jminard/32/1848_2.png) [@jminard](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/jminard)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2014, 10:08am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/if-elasticsearch-1-0-0-rc1-is-a-release-candidate-can-we-have-matching-docs/15352/1 "2014-01-22T10:08:43Z")

</div>

I am finding it hard to test ES 1.0.0.RC1 because there is no matching doc  
set for the release, and master differs in significant ways. An example,  
is the new multi-field format not being consistent with actual RC1  
implementation, and others like copy\_to which is in the master docs, but  
doesn't exist in 1.0.0.RC1. I am guessing there are more examples where  
they are out of sync and drifting further over time (and it has only been a  
short time since RC1 was released).

Is it possible to generate an actual set for the RC1 and put that on the  
site?

And, so that RC1 has more testing, maybe the download link should be a  
little larger in comparison to the 0.90.10 link to promote use.

thanks,

- Jayson

--  
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.  
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com).  
To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/7fd3774c-455b-44af-8ff0-598cc01c8bec%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/7fd3774c-455b-44af-8ff0-598cc01c8bec%40googlegroups.com).  
For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/groups/opt\_out](https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ivan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/df788c/32.png) [@Ivan](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Ivan)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2014, 8:25pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/if-elasticsearch-1-0-0-rc1-is-a-release-candidate-can-we-have-matching-docs/15352/2 "2014-01-22T20:25:27Z")

</div>

There used to be a snapshot repo if you did not want to run off the master  
build, but it appears to be no longer used.

Judging by the commits, you are perhaps bumping into one of the few items  
that differs between RC1 and the master docs. The elasticsearch team are  
doing a better job now with versioned docs, but it looks like they are not  
generated them for every minor version, just the major ones.

Cheers,

Ivan

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Jayson Minard [jayson.minard@gmail.com](mailto:jayson.minard@gmail.com)wrote:

> I am finding it hard to test ES 1.0.0.RC1 because there is no matching doc  
> set for the release, and master differs in significant ways. An example,  
> is the new multi-field format not being consistent with actual RC1  
> implementation, and others like copy\_to which is in the master docs, but  
> doesn't exist in 1.0.0.RC1. I am guessing there are more examples where  
> they are out of sync and drifting further over time (and it has only been a  
> short time since RC1 was released).
> 
> Is it possible to generate an actual set for the RC1 and put that on the  
> site?
> 
> And, so that RC1 has more testing, maybe the download link should be a  
> little larger in comparison to the 0.90.10 link to promote use.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> - Jayson
> 
> --  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  
> "elasticsearch" group.  
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an  
> email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com).  
> To view this discussion on the web visit  
> [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/7fd3774c-455b-44af-8ff0-598cc01c8bec%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/7fd3774c-455b-44af-8ff0-598cc01c8bec%40googlegroups.com)  
> .  
> For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/groups/opt\_out](https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out).

--  
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.  
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com).  
To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQBbLoeN0W6GzC6KRaXsxqf6LjB8iHBXokMc3%2B%2BFQ95XUA%40mail.gmail.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQBbLoeN0W6GzC6KRaXsxqf6LjB8iHBXokMc3%2B%2BFQ95XUA%40mail.gmail.com).  
For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/groups/opt\_out](https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 1:55am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/if-elasticsearch-1-0-0-rc1-is-a-release-candidate-can-we-have-matching-docs/15352/3 "2017-07-06T01:55:16Z")

</div>

Closed on July 6, 2017, 1:55am UTC


