# Is \_cache ignored in all cases in 2.x?

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is--cache-ignored-in-all-cases-in-2-x/41496
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [February 11, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is--cache-ignored-in-all-cases-in-2-x/41496 "2016-02-11T15:01:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jayme](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/jayme/32/6008_2.png) [@Jayme](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Jayme)
#### Post date: [February 11, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is--cache-ignored-in-all-cases-in-2-x/41496/1 "2016-02-11T15:01:35Z")

</div>

Regarding :

> <https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/13528#issuecomment-141683102>

If you run elasticsearch with : index.queries.cache.everything: true,  
and you explicitly set \_cache: false on a complex term filter that is very dynamic will this be still stored in cache or not, or does it just skip the \_cache field all together?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 5, 2017, 11:17pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is--cache-ignored-in-all-cases-in-2-x/41496/2 "2017-07-05T23:17:10Z")

</div>