# Is there is alternative for HTTP plugin in ECK version?

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-there-is-alternative-for-http-plugin-in-eck-version/325045>\
**Category:** Logstash\
**Created:** [February 8, 2023, 4:28pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-there-is-alternative-for-http-plugin-in-eck-version/325045 "2023-02-08T16:28:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kinkkong](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kinkkong/32/116466_2.png) [@kinkkong](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kinkkong)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2023, 4:28pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-there-is-alternative-for-http-plugin-in-eck-version/325045/1 "2023-02-08T16:28:06Z")

</div>

We are migrating our platform to Kubernetes, one of the features that we currently use in ELK is the logstash HTTP plugin. Unfortunately, this will be no the case in Kubernetes. Is there an alternative plugin, or ingest processor that can be used for such a case?

What is needed to be able to call Elasticsearch API when executing ingest pipeline?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2023, 4:28pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-there-is-alternative-for-http-plugin-in-eck-version/325045/2 "2023-03-08T16:28:34Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
