# Is this rally result valid?

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-this-rally-result-valid/68239>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Tags:** rally\
**Created:** [December 7, 2016, 5:09am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-this-rally-result-valid/68239 "2016-12-07T05:09:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![danielmitterdorfer](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/danielmitterdorfer/32/110510_2.png) [@danielmitterdorfer](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/danielmitterdorfer)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2016, 7:12am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-this-rally-result-valid/68239/5 "2016-12-08T07:12:56Z")

</div>

Hi Oswin,

if you've defined the ingest pipeline independently of the index, then all should be fine, that's correct. Rally will not touch the pipeline then.

As we set aside the Rally specific part, let's continue the discussion then [in the other topic you've opened](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/ingest-geoip-plugin-performance/68381).

Daniel

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/is-this-rally-result-valid/68239)._