# Kibana stack monitoring: Normalized vs not-normalized CPU utilization

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133
**Category:** Kibana
**Tags:** elastic-stack-monitoring
**Created:** [December 2, 2019, 8:18am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133 "2019-12-02T08:18:21Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![marko\_vranjkovic](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/marko_vranjkovic/32/52881_2.png) [@marko\_vranjkovic](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/marko_vranjkovic)
#### Post date: [December 2, 2019, 8:18am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133/1 "2019-12-02T08:18:22Z")

</div>

After compering CPU utilization in Kibana Stack monitoring and other tools my conclusion is that for default config:

- Filebeat CPU utilization is not normalized, meaning for 4 cores the utilization goes from 0% to 400%
- Elasticsearch CPU utilization on the other hand is normalized, i.e. for 4 cores it goes from 0% to 100%

**Can someone confirm my assumption?**  
if this is default behavior, it's pretty confusing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Liza\_Katz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/liza_katz/32/52358_2.png) [@Liza\_Katz](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Liza_Katz)
#### Post date: [December 2, 2019, 10:48am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133/2 "2019-12-02T10:48:27Z")

</div>

Hey, I suspect this post belongs in the [beats](https://discuss.elastic.co/c/beats) group.  
There you will get help from the relevant team members.

Thanks,  
Liza

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![marko\_vranjkovic](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/marko_vranjkovic/32/52881_2.png) [@marko\_vranjkovic](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/marko_vranjkovic)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2019, 8:41am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133/3 "2019-12-19T08:41:00Z")

</div>

created separate posts for Elasticsearch and Filebeat

> [@Elasticsearch CPU utilization metrics are normalized by default](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-cpu-utilization-metrics-are-normalized-by-default/210660):
>
> Can someone confirm that by using all default settings Elasticsearch CPU utilization metrics in Kibana stack monitoring are normalized, e.g. for 4 CPUs the CPU utilization goes from 0% to 100%. This question is just a first part from the original question: [Kibana stack monitoring: Normalized vs not-normalized CPU utilization](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133)

> [@Filebeat CPU utilization metrics are not normalized by default](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/filebeat-cpu-utilization-metrics-are-not-normalized-by-default/210659):
>
> Can someone confirm that by using all default settings Filebeat CPU utilization metrics in Kibana stack monitoring are not normalized, e.g. for 4 CPUs the CPU utilization goes from 0% to 400%. This question is just a first part from the original question: [Kibana stack monitoring: Normalized vs not-normalized CPU utilization](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [January 16, 2020, 8:41am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-stack-monitoring-normalized-vs-not-normalized-cpu-utilization/210133/4 "2020-01-16T08:41:07Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
