# Luke with elasticsearch **URL:** \ **Category:** Elasticsearch\ **Created:** [August 9, 2011, 9:07am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096 "2011-08-09T09:07:06Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![OlgaT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/fbc32d/32.png) [@OlgaT](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/OlgaT)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2011, 9:07am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096/1 "2011-08-09T09:07:06Z")
Hi, I would like to check correctness of my mapping using Luke and I don't success. How can I solve the problem? May be there is other tool that I can check the mapping with it. Thanks, Olga ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2011, 9:10am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096/2 "2011-08-09T09:10:22Z")
If you use get mapping, you will get the mappings elasticsearch uses (its not a plain dump of what you provided, but a normalized form of what elasticsearch "understood"). You should be able to open Luke against a single shard index data... On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:07 PM, OlgaT [tubmano@gmail.com](mailto:tubmano@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to check correctness of my mapping using Luke and I don't > success. > How can I solve the problem? May be there is other tool that I can > check the mapping with it. > > Thanks, > Olga ---
**Author:** ![OlgaT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/fbc32d/32.png) [@OlgaT](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/OlgaT)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2011, 9:13am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096/3 "2011-08-09T09:13:10Z")
I use one shard and it doesn't work with Luke On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com) wrote: > If you use get mapping, you will get the mappings elasticsearch uses (its > not a plain dump of what you provided, but a normalized form of what > elasticsearch "understood"). You should be able to open Luke against a > single shard index data... > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:07 PM, OlgaT [tubmano@gmail.com](mailto:tubmano@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to check correctness of my mapping using Luke and I don't > > success. > > How can I solve the problem? May be there is other tool that I can > > check the mapping with it. > > > > Thanks, > > Olga ---
**Author:** ![Curtis\_Caravone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e47c2d/32.png) [@Curtis\_Caravone](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Curtis_Caravone)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2011, 3:46pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096/4 "2011-08-09T15:46:51Z")
I've had success using luke 3.1.0 to open index shards from elasticsearch 0.16.2 and 0.17.2. The Lucene directory to open will be something like: \/data/\/nodes/\/indices/\/\/index/. Curtis On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Olga Tubman [tubmano@gmail.com](mailto:tubmano@gmail.com) wrote: > I use one shard and it doesn't work with Luke > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Shay Banon [kimchy@gmail.com](mailto:kimchy@gmail.com) wrote: > > > If you use get mapping, you will get the mappings elasticsearch uses (its > > not a plain dump of what you provided, but a normalized form of what > > elasticsearch "understood"). You should be able to open Luke against a > > single shard index data... > > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:07 PM, OlgaT [tubmano@gmail.com](mailto:tubmano@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to check correctness of my mapping using Luke and I don't > > > success. > > > How can I solve the problem? May be there is other tool that I can > > > check the mapping with it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Olga ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 3:57am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/luke-with-elasticsearch/5096/5 "2017-07-06T03:57:44Z")