# Modifying default \_id field

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/modifying-default-id-field/186479
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [June 19, 2019, 1:53pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/modifying-default-id-field/186479 "2019-06-19T13:53:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Karlos](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/karlos/32/44968_2.png) [@Karlos](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Karlos)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 1:53pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/modifying-default-id-field/186479/1 "2019-06-19T13:53:30Z")

</div>

Hello,

We are working in an Index system with Elasticsearch.¡, and we would like to have our own \_id fields, using a unique identifier obtained from the document to be inserted, so Elasticsearch drops a new insert in case this \_id is already present in the system.

Roughly a single request unicity check, where the insert just fails to avoid duplication.

My question is, are we loosing performance at Elasticsearch level using our own crafted \_id field?  
Is the Index keeping up its performance in resharding operations?

Thanks for any advice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/christian_dahlqvist/32/4617_2.png) [@Christian\_Dahlqvist](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Christian_Dahlqvist)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/modifying-default-id-field/186479/2 "2019-06-19T14:00:08Z")

</div>

Have a look at [this blog post](https://www.elastic.co/blog/efficient-duplicate-prevention-for-event-based-data-in-elasticsearch).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 17, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/modifying-default-id-field/186479/3 "2019-07-17T14:00:12Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
