# Percolate performance in ES 2.x vs 6.x/7.x

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/percolate-performance-in-es-2-x-vs-6-x-7-x/217262
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [January 30, 2020, 7:07pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/percolate-performance-in-es-2-x-vs-6-x-7-x/217262 "2020-01-30T19:07:39Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nikolay\_Klimchuk](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/nikolay_klimchuk/32/2131_2.png) [@Nikolay\_Klimchuk](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Nikolay_Klimchuk)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2020, 7:07pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/percolate-performance-in-es-2-x-vs-6-x-7-x/217262/1 "2020-01-30T19:07:39Z")

</div>

We're implementing use case that relies on percolate and found that on same EC2 instance type ES 2.x \_percolate latency is 10-30 times better than percolate in ES 6.x give us! Even worse with 7.x..  
Is there any chance to get old \_percolate back? It was different implementation in ES 2.x that can't be replaced with new one since performance results significantly different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2020, 7:07pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/percolate-performance-in-es-2-x-vs-6-x-7-x/217262/2 "2020-02-27T19:07:43Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
