# Performance Number of Visualization vs Number of Splitts
**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performance-number-of-visualization-vs-number-of-splitts/138043
**Category:** Kibana
**Created:** [June 29, 2018, 11:12pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performance-number-of-visualization-vs-number-of-splitts/138043 "2018-06-29T23:12:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Pritom\_Ahmed](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Pritom_Ahmed)
#### Post date: [June 29, 2018, 11:12pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performance-number-of-visualization-vs-number-of-splitts/138043/1 "2018-06-29T23:12:13Z")
Hi,
Strictly from the performance's perspective of the dashboard in the browser, which one is better
1. If I have more visualizations with no split chart feature
OR
2. If I have fewer visualizations but those visualizations have multiple split chart in each of them
Or are they similar ?
Actually my pie charts are flickering every time the dashboard refreshed. I was wondering if there was any trick that I might be missing. I tried changing the interval from 5 seconds to 30 seconds but the performance does not improve. I am running Kibana 6.3.0 in Development environment on my laptop which has 16GB RAM.
Thanks
---
### Author:  [@lukas](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/lukas)
#### Post date: [July 2, 2018, 7:39pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performance-number-of-visualization-vs-number-of-splitts/138043/2 "2018-07-02T19:39:33Z")
I wouldn't expect either to have much of a difference, honestly. Have you tried both and noticed a difference?
Would you mind taking a screenshot of both your chart and configuration for it? Maybe there's something I can suggest by looking at those.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 30, 2018, 7:39pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performance-number-of-visualization-vs-number-of-splitts/138043/3 "2018-07-30T19:39:33Z")
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.