# Performances ruby/redis vs translate filter

**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performances-ruby-redis-vs-translate-filter/150094
**Category:** Logstash
**Created:** [September 26, 2018, 11:11pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performances-ruby-redis-vs-translate-filter/150094 "2018-09-26T23:11:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![drosys](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85e7bf/32.png) [@drosys](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/drosys)
#### Post date: [September 27, 2018, 10:37pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performances-ruby-redis-vs-translate-filter/150094/3 "2018-09-27T22:37:28Z")

</div>

Hi Christian,  
Thank you for your answer it is much appreciated !  
I was not aware of this article which seems to be very interesting nad learnt me new approaches..  
It also seems that "translate" would not be suitable for large volumes / dynamic updates...  
The good thing is that I found someone which has does the same as my idea !!! (last year) with what looks like amazing results..

> [@Redis connect to local socket file in Ruby filter?](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/redis-connect-to-local-socket-file-in-ruby-filter/109655/10):
>
> Very good. I will give it a try and let you know if it works, and if so, what effect (if any) it has on the performance of the filter. Thanks for the idea!

I ll try to implement it soon 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/performances-ruby-redis-vs-translate-filter/150094)._