# Question about PageCacheRecycler's designe

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/question-about-pagecacherecyclers-designe/270460>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [April 17, 2021, 7:42pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/question-about-pagecacherecyclers-designe/270460 "2021-04-17T19:42:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rpgmakervx](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/rpgmakervx/32/87245_2.png) [@rpgmakervx](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/rpgmakervx)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2021, 7:42pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/question-about-pagecacherecyclers-designe/270460/1 "2021-04-17T19:42:36Z")

</div>

When I see PageCacheRecycler, I found the concurrent type's slot count up to avaliable processor count. but in fact thread count always exceeds processors count, so why not use more dynamic count that rely on current thread count or other idea?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2021, 7:43pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/question-about-pagecacherecyclers-designe/270460/2 "2021-05-15T19:43:17Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.