# Raid 0 SSD?

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-ssd/46504>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [April 6, 2016, 9:36am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-ssd/46504 "2016-04-06T09:36:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KlavsKlavsen](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/klavsklavsen/32/74145_2.png) [@KlavsKlavsen](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/KlavsKlavsen)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 11:05am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-ssd/46504/4 "2016-04-06T11:05:43Z")

</div>

Someone tried to ask the same here - with no real answer.. [Using RAID 0 vs multiple data paths after commit #10461](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-raid-0-vs-multiple-data-paths-after-commit-10461/855/4)

it seems no one is actually using the multiple paths approach.. even though with \*TB cluster sizes - thats a lot of money saved if its more stable than raid 0 (which has 10X the risk - with 10 disk backing it- of failure).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-ssd/46504)._