# Raid 0 with replication vs Raid 1 with no replication

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-with-replication-vs-raid-1-with-no-replication/119426>\
**Category:** Elasticsearch\
**Created:** [February 12, 2018, 8:03am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-with-replication-vs-raid-1-with-no-replication/119426 "2018-02-12T08:03:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bluishy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/3ab097/32.png) [@bluishy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/bluishy)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2018, 8:03am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-with-replication-vs-raid-1-with-no-replication/119426/1 "2018-02-12T08:03:12Z")

</div>

Hi, I'm elasticsearch starter!

I have a curious about performance between hardware spec + elasticsearch setting.

- HDD raid 0 set, replicas=1
- HDD raid 1 set, replicas=0

Which is the better to use elasticsearch ? (if disk fail, speed of recover shard .. )

Thank you for read so mess english XP

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dadoonet](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/dadoonet/32/137187_2.png) [@dadoonet](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/dadoonet)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2018, 12:36pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-with-replication-vs-raid-1-with-no-replication/119426/2 "2018-02-12T12:36:42Z")

</div>

I'd prefer the former. "HDD raid 0 set, replicas=1".

Or use of multiple `path.data` without RAID 0 at all might be even better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2018, 12:36pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/raid-0-with-replication-vs-raid-1-with-no-replication/119426/3 "2018-03-12T12:36:47Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
