# Specifying bucket values ordering in Range aggregation **URL:** \ **Category:** Elasticsearch\ **Created:** [September 10, 2014, 12:13am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/specifying-bucket-values-ordering-in-range-aggregation/19697 "2014-09-10T00:13:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Raul\_Jr\_Martinez](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/raul_jr_martinez/32/1286_2.png) [@Raul\_Jr\_Martinez](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Raul_Jr_Martinez)\ **Post date:** [September 10, 2014, 12:13am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/specifying-bucket-values-ordering-in-range-aggregation/19697/1 "2014-09-10T00:13:49Z")
Hello, I'd like to add an "order" parameter to a range aggregation ( use case: sorting the age of records from latest added to oldest) but adding "order" : {"\_terms":"asc"} or \_count causes a search error. I'm trying to confirm if "range" aggregation doesn't really support "order" parameter at this point or am I just missing anything. Been into the documentation examples, mailing list and github issues but couldn't really confirm if this is really the case. Thanks Raul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com). For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/d/optout](https://groups.google.com/d/optout). ---
**Author:** ![jpountz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/jpountz/32/45836_2.png) [@jpountz](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/jpountz)\ **Post date:** [September 10, 2014, 8:55pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/specifying-bucket-values-ordering-in-range-aggregation/19697/2 "2014-09-10T20:55:07Z")
The range aggregation indeed does not support ordering. I believe that is something that would be easy to implement on client side? On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Raul, Jr. Martinez [juneym@gmail.com](mailto:juneym@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to add an "order" parameter to a range aggregation ( use case: > sorting the age of records from latest added to oldest) but adding "order" > : {"\_terms":"asc"} or \_count causes a search error. > > I'm trying to confirm if "range" aggregation doesn't really support > "order" parameter at this point or am I just missing anything. Been into > the documentation examples, mailing list and github issues but couldn't > really confirm if this is really the case. > > Thanks > Raul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > To view this discussion on the web visit > [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com) > [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com?utm\_medium=email&utm\_source=footer](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a0b4c6a2-69b0-4e70-96ed-f1497cd80f27%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer) > . > For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/d/optout](https://groups.google.com/d/optout). -- Adrien Grand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j63wsQM%2B9tvbmku9fw8JaPdAvgvBduTrHmAG3TE54mY3w%40mail.gmail.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j63wsQM%2B9tvbmku9fw8JaPdAvgvBduTrHmAG3TE54mY3w%40mail.gmail.com). For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/d/optout](https://groups.google.com/d/optout). ---
**Author:** ![Sven\_Jorns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecd19e/32.png) [@Sven\_Jorns](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Sven_Jorns)\ **Post date:** [October 9, 2014, 1:15pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/specifying-bucket-values-ordering-in-range-aggregation/19697/3 "2014-10-09T13:15:26Z")
But if I'm limiting the results by size(), I need to order to have specific results like the 10 bests order or is there another way? Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 22:55:33 UTC+2 schrieb Adrien Grand: > The range aggregation indeed does not support ordering. I believe that is > something that would be easy to implement on client side? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com](mailto:elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2bd40662-8c7f-42f4-a713-3a4e240cda3f%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2bd40662-8c7f-42f4-a713-3a4e240cda3f%40googlegroups.com). For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/d/optout](https://groups.google.com/d/optout). ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 12:57am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/specifying-bucket-values-ordering-in-range-aggregation/19697/4 "2017-07-06T00:57:18Z")