# System metric Visualised by Kibana are not accurate

**URL:** <https://discuss.elastic.co/t/system-metric-visualised-by-kibana-are-not-accurate/176876>\
**Category:** Kibana\
**Created:** [April 15, 2019, 9:52am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/system-metric-visualised-by-kibana-are-not-accurate/176876 "2019-04-15T09:52:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rashmi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/rashmi/32/16391_2.png) [@rashmi](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/rashmi)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2019, 3:52pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/system-metric-visualised-by-kibana-are-not-accurate/176876/2 "2019-04-15T15:52:34Z")

</div>

Hi,

Can you please post more details ? Some screenshots would help of both Top and the raw documents in your cluster. As far as Ubuntu is concerned, I don't think that has anything to do with the chart variance.

More logs and screenshots+ steps would be helpful. Also please see [Metricbeat CPU information is wrong](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/metricbeat-cpu-information-is-wrong/131390/3)

Thanks  
Rashmi

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/system-metric-visualised-by-kibana-are-not-accurate/176876)._