# Using field analyzer in \_all **URL:** \ **Category:** Elasticsearch\ **Created:** [February 3, 2012, 3:01am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-field-analyzer-in--all/6578 "2012-02-03T03:01:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![James\_Wilson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/53a042/32.png) [@James\_Wilson](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/James_Wilson)\ **Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 3:01am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-field-analyzer-in--all/6578/1 "2012-02-03T03:01:53Z")
\_all takes into account individual fields' boosts, but is there a way to have the same behavior for term analysis? Right now, I have to make dismax queries for specific fields that I know have special analyzers, but that is fragile and doesn't scale well as more types are added. ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2012, 11:26am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-field-analyzer-in--all/6578/2 "2012-02-05T11:26:38Z")
No, there isn't… . We can try and support it when indexing, but then, which analyzer will one use when searching…, it can create a noisy response at best. On Friday, February 3, 2012 at 5:01 AM, James Wilson wrote: > \_all takes into account individual fields' boosts, but is there a way > to have the same behavior for term analysis? Right now, I have to make > dismax queries for specific fields that I know have special analyzers, > but that is fragile and doesn't scale well as more types are added. ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 3:40am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-field-analyzer-in--all/6578/3 "2017-07-06T03:40:36Z")