# Using two enrich policies in one ingestion pipeline
**URL:** https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767
**Category:** Elasticsearch
**Created:** [March 16, 2020, 1:24pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767 "2020-03-16T13:24:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@winlamp](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/winlamp)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 1:24pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/1 "2020-03-16T13:24:33Z")
Hi,
I'm trying to enrich one index by applying two enrich policies with two different source indices.
Here is my approach:
"enrich":
[
{
"policy\_name": "vehicle-database-policy",
"field" : "vehicle.id",
"target\_field": "vehicle-db",
"max\_matches": "1"
},
{
"policy\_name": "axle-database-policy",
"field" : "axle.id",
"target\_field": "vehicle-db",
"max\_matches": "1"
}
Using just one enrich policy is working but as soon as I try to use the second policy as well i get this error:
{
"error" : {
"root\_cause" : [
{
"type" : "parse\_exception",
"reason" : "property isn't a map, but of type [java.util.ArrayList]",
"processor\_type" : "enrich"
}
],
"type" : "parse\_exception",
"reason" : "property isn't a map, but of type [java.util.ArrayList]",
"processor\_type" : "enrich"
},
"status" : 400
}
Any help is appreciated!
Thx!
---
### Author:  [@spinscale](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/spinscale)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 1:54pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/2 "2020-03-16T13:54:15Z")
Have you tried using two seperate enrich **processors**?
---
### Author:  [@winlamp](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/winlamp)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 1:54pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/3 "2020-03-16T13:54:45Z")
Yep! Duplicate keyword enrich... Not working
---
### Author:  [@spinscale](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/spinscale)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 2:25pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/4 "2020-03-16T14:25:46Z")
please share your full pipeline as a formatted snippet.
---
### Author:  [@winlamp](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/winlamp)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 2:28pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/5 "2020-03-16T14:28:47Z")
PUT /\_ingest/pipeline/solution
{
"description" : "split and index csv files from solution",
"processors" :
[
{
"csv":
{
"field": "message",
"target\_fields":[
"@timestamp",
"lots of fields.....",
"even more fields"
]
},
"enrich":
[
{
"policy\_name": "vehicle-database-policy",
"field" : "vehicle.rfid.id",
"target\_field": "vehicle-db",
"max\_matches": "1"
},
{
"policy\_name": "axle-database-policy",
"field" : "axle.axle-position",
"target\_field": "vehicle-db",
"max\_matches": "1"
}
],
"set" :
{
```
"field" : "site.geoloc_point",
"value" : "{{site.geoloc.lat}}, {{site.geoloc.lon}}"
}
}
```
],
"on\_failure" : [
{
"set" : {
"field" : "error",
"value" : " - Error processing message - "
}
}
]
}
---
### Author:  [@spinscale](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/spinscale)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 3:38pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/6 "2020-03-16T15:38:48Z")
This is still using a single enrich processor. Try
```auto
processors: [
{
"enrich" : {}
},
{
"enrich" : {}
}
]
```
---
### Author:  [@winlamp](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/winlamp)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 3:54pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/7 "2020-03-16T15:54:19Z")
It's not working but at least there is no error. So I think it is on my side now! That's progress!
Thx!
---
### Author:  [@spinscale](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/spinscale)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 4:08pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/8 "2020-03-16T16:08:44Z")
feel free to share the output of the [Simulate Pipeline API](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.6/simulate-pipeline-api.html) with some sample documents. Do not forget the `verbose` parameter for maximum debugging.
---
### Author:  [@winlamp](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/winlamp)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 4:09pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/9 "2020-03-16T16:09:49Z")
Some minutes of head scratching and in depth comparison i found the bug. A "\_" instead of an "-" within a field name!
Now it is working as intended!
Thx for your time!
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)
#### Post date: [April 13, 2020, 4:10pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/using-two-enrich-policies-in-one-ingestion-pipeline/223767/10 "2020-04-13T16:10:00Z")
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.