# Version 0.9 Planning **URL:** \ **Category:** Elasticsearch\ **Created:** [July 14, 2010, 6:32pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101 "2010-07-14T18:32:32Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 13\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [July 14, 2010, 6:32pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/1 "2010-07-14T18:32:32Z")
Hi, Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is to reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not even amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems with it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of work directory (to name a few). Thanks, shay.banon ---
**Author:** ![Stephen\_2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/stephen_2/32/3274_2.png) [@Stephen\_2](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Stephen_2)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2010, 12:16pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/2 "2010-07-15T12:16:21Z")
Hey Shay, Sorry I haven't been following the development of 0.9 until very recently (and rereading all the old forum posts would take way too much time), but I'm not sure where to start looking to start using the new API. Where would be a good place to start? Do you have any documentation written besides JavaDoc? Thanks, Stephen. On Jul 14, 1:32 pm, Shay Banon [shay.ba...@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.ba...@elasticsearch.com) wrote: > Hi, > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement > (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is to > reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace > will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily > enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not even > amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love > people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems with > it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > work directory (to name a few). > > Thanks, > shay.banon ---
**Author:** ![Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/lukas_vlcek1/32/819_2.png) [@Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Lukas_Vlcek1)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2010, 1:27pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/3 "2010-07-15T13:27:05Z")
Hi, there is a nice summary of changes and updates in release notes on wiki: [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) I think this is a very good document you can start with for now. [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes)Just note that this document itself is still a draft and is a subject to change. Regards, Lukas On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Stephen [scstarkey@gmail.com](mailto:scstarkey@gmail.com) wrote: > Hey Shay, > > Sorry I haven't been following the development of 0.9 until very > recently (and rereading all the old forum posts would take way too > much time), but I'm not sure where to start looking to start using the > new API. Where would be a good place to start? Do you have any > documentation written besides JavaDoc? > > Thanks, > > Stephen. > > On Jul 14, 1:32 pm, Shay Banon [shay.ba...@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.ba...@elasticsearch.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement > > (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is > > to > > reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace > > will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily > > enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not > > even > > amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love > > people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems > > with > > it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > Thanks, > > shay.banon ---
**Author:** ![Franz\_Allan\_Valencia](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/franz_allan_valencia/32/3326_2.png) [@Franz\_Allan\_Valencia](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Franz_Allan_Valencia)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 3:20am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/4 "2010-07-16T03:20:05Z")
If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to reindex everything again? On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > Hi, > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement > (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is to > reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace > will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily > enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not even > amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love > people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems with > it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > work directory (to name a few). > > Thanks, > shay.banon -- Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 11:16am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/5 "2010-07-16T11:16:20Z")
Yep. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to > reindex everything again? > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement > > (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is to > > reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace > > will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily > > enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not even > > amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love > > people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems with > > it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > Thanks, > > shay.banon > > -- > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/lukas_vlcek1/32/819_2.png) [@Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Lukas_Vlcek1)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 11:30am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/6 "2010-07-16T11:30:30Z")
Hi, is there any other reason for data reindexing then gateway refactoring: [Gateway: Internal refactoring, requires manual upgrade when using fs gateway 路 Issue #232 路 elastic/elasticsearch 路 GitHub](http://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/232) (and there is a note that only manual update of metadata is needed, not complete reindexing) or is it due to upgrading the Lucene jar to higher version? Or any other reason? I think this should be explicitly mentioned in release notes [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) and if any details are available (ticket #) then let's attach reference to it. Regards, Lukas On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > Yep. > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > > > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to > > reindex everything again? > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon \<[shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to implement > > > (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature left is to > > > reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon (rackspace > > > will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it (funnily > > > enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, not even > > > amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would love > > > people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems with > > > it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > shay.banon > > > > -- > > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 11:32am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/7 "2010-07-16T11:32:23Z")
I mentioned the reasons on several posts I made to the mailing list. The reason behind it is the "reuse work directory when recovering from gateway" feature. -shay.banon On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > is there any other reason for data reindexing then gateway refactoring: > [Gateway: Internal refactoring, requires manual upgrade when using fs gateway 路 Issue #232 路 elastic/elasticsearch 路 GitHub](http://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/232) (and there is a > note that only manual update of metadata is needed, not complete reindexing) > or is it due to upgrading the Lucene jar to higher version? Or any other > reason? I think this should be explicitly mentioned in release notes > [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) and if > any details are available (ticket #) then let's attach reference to it. > > Regards, > Lukas > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > > > Yep. > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > > > > > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to > > > reindex everything again? > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon \< > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to > > > > implement (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature > > > > left is to reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon > > > > (rackspace will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it > > > > (funnily enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, > > > > not even amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would > > > > love people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems > > > > with it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > shay.banon > > > > > > -- > > > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > > > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > > > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/lukas_vlcek1/32/819_2.png) [@Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Lukas_Vlcek1)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 11:39am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/8 "2010-07-16T11:39:17Z")
So when switching from 0.8 to 0.9 then one must "convert" metadata via manual update (described in the issue 232) but data in index must be comletely reindexed. Lukas On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > I mentioned the reasons on several posts I made to the mailing list. The > reason behind it is the "reuse work directory when recovering from gateway" > feature. > > -shay.banon > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com)wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > is there any other reason for data reindexing then gateway refactoring: > > [Gateway: Internal refactoring, requires manual upgrade when using fs gateway 路 Issue #232 路 elastic/elasticsearch 路 GitHub](http://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/232) (and there is a > > note that only manual update of metadata is needed, not complete reindexing) > > or is it due to upgrading the Lucene jar to higher version? Or any other > > reason? I think this should be explicitly mentioned in release notes > > [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) and if > > any details are available (ticket #) then let's attach reference to it. > > > > Regards, > > Lukas > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shay Banon \<[shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yep. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to > > > > reindex everything again? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon \< > > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to > > > > > implement (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature > > > > > left is to reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon > > > > > (rackspace will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it > > > > > (funnily enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, > > > > > not even amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would > > > > > love people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems > > > > > with it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > > > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > > > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > shay.banon > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > > > > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > > > > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 6:05pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/9 "2010-07-16T18:05:21Z")
If you reindex, then you probably create the indices already, so no need to bother with the cluster metadata. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com) wrote: > So when switching from 0.8 to 0.9 then one must "convert" metadata via > manual update (described in the issue 232) but data in index must be > comletely reindexed. > Lukas > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > > > I mentioned the reasons on several posts I made to the mailing list. The > > reason behind it is the "reuse work directory when recovering from gateway" > > feature. > > > > -shay.banon > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com)wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there any other reason for data reindexing then gateway refactoring: > > > [Gateway: Internal refactoring, requires manual upgrade when using fs gateway 路 Issue #232 路 elastic/elasticsearch 路 GitHub](http://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/232) (and there is a > > > note that only manual update of metadata is needed, not complete reindexing) > > > or is it due to upgrading the Lucene jar to higher version? Or any other > > > reason? I think this should be explicitly mentioned in release notes > > > [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) and if > > > any details are available (ticket #) then let's attach reference to it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lukas > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shay Banon \< > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > Yep. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< > > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have to > > > > > reindex everything again? > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon \< > > > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to > > > > > > implement (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature > > > > > > left is to reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon > > > > > > (rackspace will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it > > > > > > (funnily enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, > > > > > > not even amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would > > > > > > love people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems > > > > > > with it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > > > > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > > > > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > shay.banon > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > > > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > > > > > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > > > > > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/lukas_vlcek1/32/819_2.png) [@Lukas\_Vlcek1](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Lukas_Vlcek1)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2010, 7:17pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/10 "2010-07-16T19:17:28Z")
Ah... good point. I added note to release notes (so that I do not have to ask again the next time 馃檪 On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Shay Banon [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)wrote: > If you reindex, then you probably create the indices already, so no need to > bother with the cluster metadata. > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com)wrote: > > > So when switching from 0.8 to 0.9 then one must "convert" metadata via > > manual update (described in the issue 232) but data in index must be > > comletely reindexed. > > Lukas > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Shay Banon \<[shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I mentioned the reasons on several posts I made to the mailing list. The > > > reason behind it is the "reuse work directory when recovering from gateway" > > > feature. > > > > > > -shay.banon > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Luk谩拧 Vl膷ek [lukas.vlcek@gmail.com](mailto:lukas.vlcek@gmail.com)wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > is there any other reason for data reindexing then gateway refactoring: > > > > [Gateway: Internal refactoring, requires manual upgrade when using fs gateway 路 Issue #232 路 elastic/elasticsearch 路 GitHub](http://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/232) (and there is > > > > a note that only manual update of metadata is needed, not complete > > > > reindexing) or is it due to upgrading the Lucene jar to higher version? Or > > > > any other reason? I think this should be explicitly mentioned in release > > > > notes [http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes](http://wiki.github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/release-notes) and > > > > if any details are available (ticket #) then let's attach reference to it. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Lukas > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shay Banon \< > > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yep. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See \< > > > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > If I switch from 0.8 to 0.9 (assuming same configuration), do I have > > > > > > to reindex everything again? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Shay Banon \< > > > > > > [shay.banon@elasticsearch.com](mailto:shay.banon@elasticsearch.com)\> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Version 0.9 is almost done. Most of the features I wanted to > > > > > > > implement (and there are many of them 馃槈 ) are done, with the only feature > > > > > > > left is to reimplement the cloud plugin, initially only to support amazon > > > > > > > (rackspace will come in a later version). I am working on implementing it > > > > > > > (funnily enough, no amazon cloud library is good enough to do what I want, > > > > > > > not even amazon formal one) and once its done 0.9 will be released. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, and because of the scope of the release, I would > > > > > > > love people to start using 0.9 and see if they can help flush any problems > > > > > > > with it. Mainly focusing on things that might broke from 0.8, but also, if > > > > > > > possible, testdrive the new features like facets, new Java API, reuse of > > > > > > > work directory (to name a few). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > shay.banon > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Franz Allan Valencia See | Java Software Engineer > > > > > > [franz.see@gmail.com](mailto:franz.see@gmail.com) > > > > > > LinkedIn: [http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee](http://www.linkedin.com/in/franzsee) > > > > > > Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/franz\_see](http://www.twitter.com/franz_see) ---
**Author:** ![Jack\_Key](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/jack_key/32/3321_2.png) [@Jack\_Key](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/Jack_Key)\ **Post date:** [July 20, 2010, 6:49pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/11 "2010-07-20T18:49:39Z")
Hello, Shay. The new "facet" features of 9.0 (terms especially) are turning out to be incredibly useful. I have been working from snapshots of 9.0, but I was wondering how close you are to a 9.0 release. Regards, Jack ---
**Author:** ![kimchy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/user_avatar/discuss.elastic.co/kimchy/32/44952_2.png) [@kimchy](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/kimchy)\ **Post date:** [July 20, 2010, 8:27pm UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/12 "2010-07-20T20:27:19Z")
Having a bit of a snag with the cloud plugin. Due to all the other features in elasticsearch, I might release 0.9 and with a special notice that the cloud plugin is in alpha stage, and I will address it for 0.9.1. Hopefully 0.9 will be released in a few days. -shay.banon On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jack Key [joeandrewkey@gmail.com](mailto:joeandrewkey@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello, Shay. > > The new "facet" features of 9.0 (terms especially) are turning out to be > incredibly useful. > I have been working from snapshots of 9.0, but I was wondering how close > you > are to a 9.0 release. > > Regards, Jack > > -- > View this message in context: > [http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/Version-0-9-Planning-tp967339p982204.html](http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/Version-0-9-Planning-tp967339p982204.html) > Sent from the Elasticsearch Users mailing list archive at [Nabble.com](http://Nabble.com). ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/elastic/original/3X/1/a/1ac57faf039f6b580b3f104ef42a2a89e41014de.png) [@system](https://discuss.elastic.co/u/system)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2017, 4:21am UTC](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/version-0-9-planning/3101/13 "2017-07-06T04:21:59Z")