--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
We managed to get the field data changes out in 0.90, those were a requirement for any result grouping support that we would add. Now that we have it, we will start to explore how to best add it.
My applications currently use a 0.20.x version and those (great) features
make me think about upgrading to 0.90.beta1.
I know this is a beta version and I should only consider it for a test
platform; but I'd like to know a couple of things:
can anybody share her experience with this version? (upgrade,
stability, CPU/memory usage, data recovery, cluster state...)
the official post states that the GA version should be released soon;
is there a web page where I can watch the current state (there's no
milestone nor tag for the next 0.90.x release).
Keep up the good work towards 1.0!
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:43:02 PM UTC+1, kimchy wrote:
We managed to get the field data changes out in 0.90, those were a
requirement for any result grouping support that we would add. Now that we
have it, we will start to explore how to best add it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
My applications currently use a 0.20.x version and those (great) features
make me think about upgrading to 0.90.beta1.
I know this is a beta version and I should only consider it for a test
platform; but I'd like to know a couple of things:
can anybody share her experience with this version? (upgrade,
stability, CPU/memory usage, data recovery, cluster state...)
the official post states that the GA version should be released
soon; is there a web page where I can watch the current state (there's no
milestone nor tag for the next 0.90.x release).
Keep up the good work towards 1.0!
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:43:02 PM UTC+1, kimchy wrote:
We managed to get the field data changes out in 0.90, those were a
requirement for any result grouping support that we would add. Now that we
have it, we will start to explore how to best add it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@**googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@**googlegroups.com.
I'm right now moving my Java code to 0.90.0.Beta1 - there are API
changes so I forked my code into stable and development.
Not too busy with testing because of this, but 0.90.0.Beta1 looks pretty
well so far (focus on bulk indexing) - you want performance numbers to
share?
For production I plan to use 1.00 - not 0.90 - so I have time to add new
features and test, e.g. comparing with 0.19/0.20
Jörg
Am 11.03.13 17:32, schrieb Brian Clozel:
My applications currently use a 0.20.x version and those (great)
features make me think about upgrading to 0.90.beta1.
I know this is a beta version and I should only consider it for a test
platform; but I'd like to know a couple of things:
can anybody share her experience with this version? (upgrade,
stability, CPU/memory usage, data recovery, cluster state...)
the official post states that the GA version should be released
soon; is there a web page where I can watch the current state
(there's no milestone nor tag for the next 0.90.x release).
One thing to be aware of - if you use "ids" queries, without "type" option,
they will fail with an 'Index out of bounds' exception.
See https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/2695. Is fixed
in trunk, so will be fixed in 0.90 Beta 2.
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.