Aggregates - include source data

Hi,

From looking at the docs, didn't seem overly clear. Is it possible to
include the data in an aggregate, or is it counts only?

John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/83032bdc-53f4-4728-b109-e9ab3eb3d412%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Aggregations only report counts or various metrics (see the metrics
aggregations: stats, min, max, sum, percentiles, cardinality, top_hits,
...). Maybe top_hits is what you are looking for?

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:34 PM, John D. Ament john.d.ament@gmail.com
wrote:

Hi,

From looking at the docs, didn't seem overly clear. Is it possible to
include the data in an aggregate, or is it counts only?

John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/83032bdc-53f4-4728-b109-e9ab3eb3d412%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/83032bdc-53f4-4728-b109-e9ab3eb3d412%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Adrien Grand

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j7Kct0y6LfDFENvvfgnN7N04vOpp35zRpg%3DG4AHw94Jhg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Does this condition still apply? Any chances to overcome a need of hard-coding size argument?