ran
May 25, 2014, 11:36am
1
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from Amazon)
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16 nodes
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
warkolm
May 25, 2014, 11:01pm
2
It depends. You probably won't get a linear drop in heap size by halving
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineermarkw@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 25 May 2014 21:36, Ran Franco ran@taykey.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16 nodes
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624YX%3D9Z9ZSWQb2wEdXaaSbucBz0zdccnHaocGtAXYo3ABg%40mail.gmail.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
ran
May 26, 2014, 4:45am
3
Hi Mark,
My current heap size 12GB
On Monday, May 26, 2014 2:01:41 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
It depends. You probably won't get a linear drop in heap size by halving
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com <javascript:>www.campaignmonitor.com
On 25 May 2014 21:36, Ran Franco <r...@taykey.com <javascript:>> wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16 nodes
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
warkolm
May 26, 2014, 4:50am
4
But what is the use, are you close to 100% use of that?
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineermarkw@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 26 May 2014 14:45, Ran Franco ran@taykey.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
My current heap size 12GB
On Monday, May 26, 2014 2:01:41 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
It depends. You probably won't get a linear drop in heap size by halving
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 25 May 2014 21:36, Ran Franco r...@taykey.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/ 40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624aPj4rX%2B6FjcQ-WrkQPk1x%3DOstv0JHTJfQmUxfZx1tSGA%40mail.gmail.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
ran
May 26, 2014, 4:59am
5
Ho sorry..
On Monday, May 26, 2014 7:50:43 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
But what is the use, are you close to 100% use of that?
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com <javascript:>www.campaignmonitor.com
On 26 May 2014 14:45, Ran Franco <r...@taykey.com <javascript:>> wrote:
Hi Mark,
My current heap size 12GB
On Monday, May 26, 2014 2:01:41 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
It depends. You probably won't get a linear drop in heap size by halving
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 25 May 2014 21:36, Ran Franco r...@taykey.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/ 40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1cef7433-2414-4c45-bcfe-eaf65e9cbc2e%40googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
warkolm
May 26, 2014, 5:02am
6
You should really only be running heap at 50% of total system RAM, that
However you may find that moving to more smaller nodes will push your use a
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineermarkw@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 26 May 2014 14:59, Ran Franco ran@taykey.com wrote:
Ho sorry..
On Monday, May 26, 2014 7:50:43 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
But what is the use, are you close to 100% use of that?
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 26 May 2014 14:45, Ran Franco r...@taykey.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
My current heap size 12GB
On Monday, May 26, 2014 2:01:41 AM UTC+3, Mark Walkom wrote:
It depends. You probably won't get a linear drop in heap size by
Regards,
Infrastructure Engineerma...@campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
On 25 May 2014 21:36, Ran Franco r...@taykey.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm using ES cluster with 8 nodes (m3.xlarge machines from
I wanted to know if i'll get better performance whether I'll use 16
What is preferred? a bigger cluster with weaker machines? or smaller
Thanks !
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/ glegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1ebe28b7-fa45-495f-94d8-400976b75ae5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/ 40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9b73d836-8bb8-44c0-81c9-709038f70629%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1cef7433-2414-4c45-bcfe-eaf65e9cbc2e%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1cef7433-2414-4c45-bcfe-eaf65e9cbc2e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624atd2e%2BRD%2BJpm31YNtvsKcdtNsDWSmtKjoTCYixoRE9%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com .https://groups.google.com/d/optout .