Bool filters vs and filters - more questions

Hello, everyone.

I've read a few threads from various sources about de differences between a
boolFilter (with several must clauses) and an andFilter.

The conclusions where that a boolFilter is prefered (due to the speed of
bitwise operations), as long as you do not have numeric_ranges filters,
scripts filters and geo_distance filters. (because those do not create

However, with the andFilter, if a filter does not match a doc, subsequent
filters will not be applied to this docs, wich seems highly interresting.
Here, we are working with very complicated docs, containings hundreds of
different fields, and I was wondering....
If the queries we do here had lots of filters (7-10) and the fields used
for those queries had a lot (and I mean a lot) of different values (wich
would actually means that for a fair bit of the filters, the bitset would
not yet be present, I assume) ... would it still be more efficient to use a
boolFilter over an AndFilter? (even if none of the filters are of the three
aforementionned types that does not build bitsets)
Or would the "short-circuit effect" of the andFilter more than make up for
the lack of bitwise operations?

Any insight on that matter would be of a tremendous help.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
For more options, visit