Hey,
I've noticed some request time spikes with 0.16.2 that I hadn't
observed with 0.14.2. I know that mlockall was critical in ensuring
that GC didn't have much hit on response times.
The docs state that:
In order to see if this works or not, set the common.jna logging to
DEBUG level. A solution to “Unknown mlockall error 0” can be to set
ulimit -l unlimited.
I have set common.jna logging to DEBUG, but don't see any messages
logged from this class. Is that a confirmation that mlockall is
working or should I expect to see something indicating that it is
working?
Hey,
I've noticed some request time spikes with 0.16.2 that I hadn't
observed with 0.14.2. I know that mlockall was critical in ensuring
that GC didn't have much hit on response times.
The docs state that:
In order to see if this works or not, set the common.jna logging to
DEBUG level. A solution to “Unknown mlockall error 0” can be to set
ulimit -l unlimited.
I have set common.jna logging to DEBUG, but don't see any messages
logged from this class. Is that a confirmation that mlockall is
working or should I expect to see something indicating that it is
working?
I had the same worries about whether my mlockall setting was actually
set, would it be possible to put a positive message in the logs like
"mlockall now working"?
Hey,
I've noticed some request time spikes with 0.16.2 that I hadn't
observed with 0.14.2. I know that mlockall was critical in ensuring
that GC didn't have much hit on response times.
The docs state that:
In order to see if this works or not, set the common.jna logging to
DEBUG level. A solution to “Unknown mlockall error 0” can be to set
ulimit -l unlimited.
I have set common.jna logging to DEBUG, but don't see any messages
logged from this class. Is that a confirmation that mlockall is
working or should I expect to see something indicating that it is
working?
I had the same worries about whether my mlockall setting was actually
set, would it be possible to put a positive message in the logs like
"mlockall now working"?
Hey,
I've noticed some request time spikes with 0.16.2 that I hadn't
observed with 0.14.2. I know that mlockall was critical in ensuring
that GC didn't have much hit on response times.
The docs state that:
In order to see if this works or not, set the common.jna logging to
DEBUG level. A solution to “Unknown mlockall error 0” can be to set
ulimit -l unlimited.
I have set common.jna logging to DEBUG, but don't see any messages
logged from this class. Is that a confirmation that mlockall is
working or should I expect to see something indicating that it is
working?
I had the same worries about whether my mlockall setting was actually
set, would it be possible to put a positive message in the logs like
"mlockall now working"?
Hey,
I've noticed some request time spikes with 0.16.2 that I hadn't
observed with 0.14.2. I know that mlockall was critical in ensuring
that GC didn't have much hit on response times.
The docs state that:
In order to see if this works or not, set the common.jna logging to
DEBUG level. A solution to “Unknown mlockall error 0” can be to set
ulimit -l unlimited.
I have set common.jna logging to DEBUG, but don't see any messages
logged from this class. Is that a confirmation that mlockall is
working or should I expect to see something indicating that it is
working?
where (as in what file, is it etc/init.d/elasticsearch, or /etc/elasticsearch/elasticsearch.yml?) do I set the common.jna, and what is the syntax for setting it to debug?
do I just set
common.jna = DEBUG
next to
bootstrap.mlockall: true
?
Where would I then follow the log to see this? would that be in /var/log/elasticsearch/elasticsearch.log?
when would this appear there, when I start the service ("service elasticsearch start")?
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant logo are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.