Evaluating Moving to Discourse - Feedback Wanted

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko itamar@code972.com
wrote:

Right now if a question title in my inbox catches my eye I'll quickly read
it and respond.

Me too.

I'm happy to try anything. I'm invested enough in the community that I'd
actually go and setup the email on every post thing. The transition is
probably going to be rough but that is life.

Nik

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAPmjWd3ZXizkxhd4yZ%2BS5dE6pj%3Dp836JvcFzkvWEdBw5LsK3%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

My experiment so far:
Action: enabled email notification for all new posts
Outcome: Received a notification

Action: post by replying to a notification email:
Outcome:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fHmgizKoI-Y/VS6uXmOD5tI/AAAAAAAAA8E/7aCXAfS0HsQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-04-15%2Bat%2B2.27.14%2BPM.png
Guidance?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 1:21:07 PM UTC-4, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com
<javascript:>> wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's a
line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co
<javascript:>> wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information would
always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com
<javascript:>> wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) of
the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with it.
It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co
<javascript:>> wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all
of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/0feab0ea-6f38-4ff7-a31e-b4d27707d60a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Glen,

We'll be setting up a dedicated instance of Discourse with the
functionality in question, which is still forthcoming. Once we have that,
we'll be able to provide the information necessary to subscribe to what
you're interested in and reply via email.

We've been beating on Discourse for a while now to ensure everything works
as promised, and I can confirm that the features you're testing work - we
just haven't deployed the platform yet. We're approaching this skeptically
to ensure the features we want do what we expect. :slight_smile:

Cheers,
Tyler

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 12:31:19 PM UTC-6, Glen Smith wrote:

My experiment so far:
Action: enabled email notification for all new posts
Outcome: Received a notification

Action: post by replying to a notification email:
Outcome:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fHmgizKoI-Y/VS6uXmOD5tI/AAAAAAAAA8E/7aCXAfS0HsQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-04-15%2Bat%2B2.27.14%2BPM.png
Guidance?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 1:21:07 PM UTC-4, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's a
line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information would
always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) of
the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with it.
It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as
the fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no
API hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for
all of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to
    getting peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a
mailing list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and
will continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming
feedback and be completely transparent about how our thought processes
evolve based on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9818e419-3900-45d0-b10c-6714ed673e38%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Tyler-

Thanks. I hope it's 100% clear to everyone with that concern now.

Regards,
Glen

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 3:06:23 PM UTC-4, ty...@elastic.co wrote:

Glen,

We'll be setting up a dedicated instance of Discourse with the
functionality in question, which is still forthcoming. Once we have that,
we'll be able to provide the information necessary to subscribe to what
you're interested in and reply via email.

We've been beating on Discourse for a while now to ensure everything works
as promised, and I can confirm that the features you're testing work - we
just haven't deployed the platform yet. We're approaching this skeptically
to ensure the features we want do what we expect. :slight_smile:

Cheers,
Tyler

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 12:31:19 PM UTC-6, Glen Smith wrote:

My experiment so far:
Action: enabled email notification for all new posts
Outcome: Received a notification

Action: post by replying to a notification email:
Outcome:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fHmgizKoI-Y/VS6uXmOD5tI/AAAAAAAAA8E/7aCXAfS0HsQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-04-15%2Bat%2B2.27.14%2BPM.png
Guidance?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 1:21:07 PM UTC-4, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's
a line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information
would always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com
wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical)
of the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with
it. It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open
source projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for
dealing with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple
mailing lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure
out where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem
to have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a
wide variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of
questions asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python
client would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as
the fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no
API hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for
all of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to
    getting peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a
mailing list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and
will continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often
and get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming
feedback and be completely transparent about how our thought processes
evolve based on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] -
Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a769cf7a-6e57-463e-92be-02aaf673a663%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

I believe the best developers are cynics. Never trust someone else's code,
that API, the OS, etc :slight_smile:

What bothers me about Discourse is that email is an afterthought. They have
not built out that feature yet? For me, and apparently many others, email
is the first concern.

The transition is understandable if you want to transition from a closed
system. The other reason, not enough fragmentation, is worrisome. If no one
uses the logstash list, that is a problem with the site/documentation, not
the mailing list itself. I cringe at the thought of an Elasticsearch forum
with a dozen subforums.

Ivan
On Apr 15, 2015 7:21 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co
wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic ivan@brusic.com wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's a
line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co
wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information would
always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic ivan@brusic.com wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) of
the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with it.
It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co
wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all
of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQDtXhyerHBayT33O1388JtB_NmER8m-w_zyuv7%2Bepn87A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This is really important for us in China!!
Please switch to whatever service that is accessible in China.
Thank you.

在 2015年4月2日星期四 UTC+8下午11:36:33,leslie.hawthorn写道:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering shuttering
the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor of a
Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all of
our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better targeted
    discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client, individual
    logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings, etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list now,
    such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development to
    production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives, and
cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but obviously
that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re sharing
this information to set expectations about time frame for making the
switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure effective
migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a longer
time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and get
your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. We
don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback and
be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based on
it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/91ff6d92-4847-4e6c-9836-2908f06f3ba7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Hi
I agree with Jorge 100%: adopting a license which gives people the freedom
to construct datasets would be great. As I already suggested too to leslie,
I think one of the most interesting things coudl be indeed releasing the
dataset of the conversations, and costruct over there some example :slight_smile:
Obviously I hope there will be an ES plugin for discourse! (if it doesn't
exist already)

Il giorno lunedì 20 aprile 2015 14:42:32 UTC+2, Ivan Brusic ha scritto:

I believe the best developers are cynics. Never trust someone else's
code, that API, the OS, etc :slight_smile:

What bothers me about Discourse is that email is an afterthought. They
have not built out that feature yet? For me, and apparently many others,
email is the first concern.

The transition is understandable if you want to transition from a closed
system. The other reason, not enough fragmentation, is worrisome. If no one
uses the logstash list, that is a problem with the site/documentation, not
the mailing list itself. I cringe at the thought of an Elasticsearch forum
with a dozen subforums.

Ivan
On Apr 15, 2015 7:21 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co
<javascript:>> wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com
<javascript:>> wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's a
line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co
<javascript:>> wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information would
always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com
<javascript:>> wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) of
the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with it.
It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co
<javascript:>> wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as
the fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no
API hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for
all of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to
    getting peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a
mailing list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and
will continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming
feedback and be completely transparent about how our thought processes
evolve based on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3ae23e3c-071d-4dc7-b279-af940e6706c9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

I've long wondered how it is that the Elasticsearch tribe could not build
something within its own community, a platform that uses Elasticsearch to
provide the UX being discussed here (a term occasionally used for that is
"eat your own dog food"). Just thinkin...

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Alfredo Serafini seralf@gmail.com wrote:

Hi
I agree with Jorge 100%: adopting a license which gives people the freedom
to construct datasets would be great. As I already suggested too to leslie,
I think one of the most interesting things coudl be indeed releasing the
dataset of the conversations, and costruct over there some example :slight_smile:
Obviously I hope there will be an ES plugin for discourse! (if it doesn't
exist already)

Il giorno lunedì 20 aprile 2015 14:42:32 UTC+2, Ivan Brusic ha scritto:

I believe the best developers are cynics. Never trust someone else's
code, that API, the OS, etc :slight_smile:

What bothers me about Discourse is that email is an afterthought. They
have not built out that feature yet? For me, and apparently many others,
email is the first concern.

The transition is understandable if you want to transition from a closed
system. The other reason, not enough fragmentation, is worrisome. If no one
uses the logstash list, that is a problem with the site/documentation, not
the mailing list itself. I cringe at the thought of an Elasticsearch forum
with a dozen subforums.

Ivan
On Apr 15, 2015 7:21 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co wrote:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com wrote:

I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.

Understood.

The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of
our inputs.

Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's
a line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I
respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen
regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason.
:slight_smile:

I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an
account.

You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your
preferences and then read/interact solely via email.

Cheers,
LH

Cheers,

Ivan
On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.

There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information
would always be archived there as well.

Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?

Folks, please keep the feedback coming!

Cheers,
LH

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic iv...@brusic.com
wrote:

As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical)
of the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with
it. It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.

For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the
mailing list since everything is archived.

Ivan
On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" leslie....@elastic.co
wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open
source projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for
dealing with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple
mailing lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure
out where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem
to have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a
wide variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of
questions asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python
client would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as
the fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no
API hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for
all of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to
    getting peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a
mailing list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and
will continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often
and get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming
feedback and be completely transparent about how our thought processes
evolve based on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] -
Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4Catt84uQTY9xJEQGggE6o5gU9Q5uQ%3DnKQD9Bp3T%3D%3Dfmg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3ae23e3c-071d-4dc7-b279-af940e6706c9%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3ae23e3c-071d-4dc7-b279-af940e6706c9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAH6s0fwaD2-nBAb9Ms5n7EQiiREu4Q%2B5UnAOJHs5YjSx65h9Hg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would be
awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
people who haven't learned the various ways developers communicate.

That said, if the forum idea is scrapped, please be sure to stick with
Google Groups or something similar. Don't switch to something like the
Debian user lists. Every time a search result pops up from a list like that
when I am looking for help, I can never figure out if I've seen all the
emails in the thread or not. The interface is just horrid. Google Groups at
least has conversation view.

On a similar subject, is there any chance we could get a real time chat app
that is more user friendly than IRC? Does something exist that could sit on
top of IRC and alleviate the IRC's user unfriendliness?

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 8:36:33 AM UTC-7, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering shuttering
the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor of a
Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all of
our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better targeted
    discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client, individual
    logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings, etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list now,
    such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development to
    production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives, and
cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but obviously
that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re sharing
this information to set expectations about time frame for making the
switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure effective
migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a longer
time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and get
your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. We
don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback and
be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based on
it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would be
awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
people who haven't learned the various ways developers communicate.

Thanks for your feedback!

That said, if the forum idea is scrapped, please be sure to stick with
Google Groups or something similar. Don't switch to something like the
Debian user lists. Every time a search result pops up from a list like that
when I am looking for help, I can never figure out if I've seen all the
emails in the thread or not. The interface is just horrid. Google Groups at
least has conversation view.

Mailman is little painful, but with the latest release it's become a bit
friendlier.

On a similar subject, is there any chance we could get a real time chat
app that is more user friendly than IRC? Does something exist that could
sit on top of IRC and alleviate the IRC's user unfriendliness?

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?

Cheers,
LH

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 8:36:33 AM UTC-7, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all of
our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better targeted
    discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client, individual
    logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings, etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list now,
    such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development to
    production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives, and
cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and get
your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. We
don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?
I use webchat.freenode.net.

There's a big difference between, "Here's our live chat app." and "Learn
how to connect to IRC in order to use live chat." I actively avoided live
chat for years simply because I had no interest in learning anything about
IRC. For a new user, IRC is not friendly, especially if you are not a
developer or are new to it.

There's also the fact that you are told off if you post any code when
asking for help. I could see it if the code sample was really long, but
when people get told off when they post three or four lines of code, that's
not friendly at all. This has happened to me, and I've seen it happen to
others. (Not sure it if was in an ELK channel or not...)

Plus, figuring out how to start a private conversation, or set your status
to away, or registering your username so others can't impersonate you, and
so on is not obvious. I still haven't taken the time to figure it out.

Ideally, we'd have something that functions similar to HipChat. Nice UI,
and code snippets are automatically shortened unless you choose to show the
full snippet.

--David Reagan

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Leslie Hawthorn <leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co

wrote:

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would be
awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
people who haven't learned the various ways developers communicate.

Thanks for your feedback!

That said, if the forum idea is scrapped, please be sure to stick with
Google Groups or something similar. Don't switch to something like the
Debian user lists. Every time a search result pops up from a list like that
when I am looking for help, I can never figure out if I've seen all the
emails in the thread or not. The interface is just horrid. Google Groups at
least has conversation view.

Mailman is little painful, but with the latest release it's become a bit
friendlier.

On a similar subject, is there any chance we could get a real time chat
app that is more user friendly than IRC? Does something exist that could
sit on top of IRC and alleviate the IRC's user unfriendliness?

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?

Cheers,
LH

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 8:36:33 AM UTC-7, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all
of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better targeted
    discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client, individual
    logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings, etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list now,
    such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development to
    production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives, and
cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. We
don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/UQcTOKpQihU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AdMPB7RfUpARyq45Oa09tFfmhd7VH%3DBzmaiAiDWYi%2Bx0w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Hi David,

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:36 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?
I use webchat.freenode.net.

There's a big difference between, "Here's our live chat app." and "Learn
how to connect to IRC in order to use live chat." I actively avoided live
chat for years simply because I had no interest in learning anything about
IRC. For a new user, IRC is not friendly, especially if you are not a
developer or are new to it.

I hear you. I think those of us who have been using IRC for decades think
it is easy. I know I find it more intuitive than HipChat.

There's also the fact that you are told off if you post any code when
asking for help. I could see it if the code sample was really long, but
when people get told off when they post three or four lines of code, that's
not friendly at all. This has happened to me, and I've seen it happen to
others. (Not sure it if was in an ELK channel or not...)

I sure hope not - we pride ourselves on having a courteous and welcoming
community presence. Each channel has its own culture, and some are brusque
or downright rude. That's not how we play it. :slight_smile:

Plus, figuring out how to start a private conversation, or set your status
to away, or registering your username so others can't impersonate you, and
so on is not obvious. I still haven't taken the time to figure it out.

Yes, and a pointer to an FAQ doc isn't interesting when you want something
to just work(TM).

Ideally, we'd have something that functions similar to HipChat. Nice UI,
and code snippets are automatically shortened unless you choose to show the
full snippet.

Worth thinking through, though I doubt we'll action this any time soon.
We're doing our best to maintain good coverage in our IRC channels and
folks would still prefer Elastic employees were around more often. Opening
up yet another chat mechanism seems like a way to make sure even more
people feel the same way. :wink:

Really appreciate the feedback!

Cheers,
LH

--David Reagan

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Leslie Hawthorn <
leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co> wrote:

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would
be awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
people who haven't learned the various ways developers communicate.

Thanks for your feedback!

That said, if the forum idea is scrapped, please be sure to stick with
Google Groups or something similar. Don't switch to something like the
Debian user lists. Every time a search result pops up from a list like that
when I am looking for help, I can never figure out if I've seen all the
emails in the thread or not. The interface is just horrid. Google Groups at
least has conversation view.

Mailman is little painful, but with the latest release it's become a bit
friendlier.

On a similar subject, is there any chance we could get a real time chat
app that is more user friendly than IRC? Does something exist that could
sit on top of IRC and alleviate the IRC's user unfriendliness?

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?

Cheers,
LH

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 8:36:33 AM UTC-7, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all
of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list now,
    such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development to
    production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. We
don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/UQcTOKpQihU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AdMPB7RfUpARyq45Oa09tFfmhd7VH%3DBzmaiAiDWYi%2Bx0w%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AdMPB7RfUpARyq45Oa09tFfmhd7VH%3DBzmaiAiDWYi%2Bx0w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4CA94-9o15zBNvw714aNjwCnHDMM3%3DKMWRZXgWdQPKG%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Worth thinking through, though I doubt we'll action this any time soon.
We're doing our best to maintain good coverage in our IRC channels and
folks would still prefer Elastic employees were around more often. Opening
up yet another chat mechanism seems like a way to make sure even more
people feel the same way. :wink:

Yep, starting something like my suggestion would be a major project. Not
something to do lightly.

One idea, that might be easy to implement, would be to host your own IRC
webchat interface, and if possible, have it automatically open the
elasticsearch channels. Then users could go to elastic.co, hover over the
Community nav link, and just click "chat".

--David Reagan

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Leslie Hawthorn leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co
wrote:

Hi David,

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:36 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?
I use webchat.freenode.net.

There's a big difference between, "Here's our live chat app." and "Learn
how to connect to IRC in order to use live chat." I actively avoided live
chat for years simply because I had no interest in learning anything about
IRC. For a new user, IRC is not friendly, especially if you are not a
developer or are new to it.

I hear you. I think those of us who have been using IRC for decades think
it is easy. I know I find it more intuitive than HipChat.

There's also the fact that you are told off if you post any code when
asking for help. I could see it if the code sample was really long, but
when people get told off when they post three or four lines of code, that's
not friendly at all. This has happened to me, and I've seen it happen to
others. (Not sure it if was in an ELK channel or not...)

I sure hope not - we pride ourselves on having a courteous and welcoming
community presence. Each channel has its own culture, and some are brusque
or downright rude. That's not how we play it. :slight_smile:

Plus, figuring out how to start a private conversation, or set your
status to away, or registering your username so others can't impersonate
you, and so on is not obvious. I still haven't taken the time to figure it
out.

Yes, and a pointer to an FAQ doc isn't interesting when you want something
to just work(TM).

Ideally, we'd have something that functions similar to HipChat. Nice UI,
and code snippets are automatically shortened unless you choose to show the
full snippet.

Worth thinking through, though I doubt we'll action this any time soon.
We're doing our best to maintain good coverage in our IRC channels and
folks would still prefer Elastic employees were around more often. Opening
up yet another chat mechanism seems like a way to make sure even more
people feel the same way. :wink:

Really appreciate the feedback!

Cheers,
LH

--David Reagan

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Leslie Hawthorn <
leslie.hawthorn@elastic.co> wrote:

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Reagan jerrac@gmail.com wrote:

Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would
be awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
people who haven't learned the various ways developers communicate.

Thanks for your feedback!

That said, if the forum idea is scrapped, please be sure to stick with
Google Groups or something similar. Don't switch to something like the
Debian user lists. Every time a search result pops up from a list like that
when I am looking for help, I can never figure out if I've seen all the
emails in the thread or not. The interface is just horrid. Google Groups at
least has conversation view.

Mailman is little painful, but with the latest release it's become a bit
friendlier.

On a similar subject, is there any chance we could get a real time chat
app that is more user friendly than IRC? Does something exist that could
sit on top of IRC and alleviate the IRC's user unfriendliness?

Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?

Cheers,
LH

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 8:36:33 AM UTC-7, leslie.hawthorn wrote:

Hello everyone,

As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to figure out
where to go to ask a question.

We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem to
have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such a wide
variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of questions
asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our Python client
would rather not be distracted with emails about it.

There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as the
fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it provides no API
hooks and it is not available for users in China.

We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering
shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in favor
of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at
http://www.discourse.org

We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for all
of our users for a few reasons:

  • More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better
    targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language client,
    individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group meetings,
    etc.

  • Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list
    now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to development
    to production

  • Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to getting
    peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it

Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a mailing
list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported and will
continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email (though
there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])

We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this
transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular issue.
We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for both
user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of how
that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)

The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives,
and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions.

We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but
obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. We’re
sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for making
the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure
effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may mean a
longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.

In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often and
get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? Meh?

Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback.
We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it will
impact your overall workflow and experience.

We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming feedback
and be completely transparent about how our thought processes evolve based
on it.

Thanks in advance!

[0] - Migrating from Google Groups - migration - Discourse Meta

Cheers,
LH

Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9642561-6a95-43a7-a55a-7e239cdfcdf3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/UQcTOKpQihU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4BY7NqNOqyRmsFUY-2incY8yb%3DsMh0ipYmYs44Ssydzng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AdMPB7RfUpARyq45Oa09tFfmhd7VH%3DBzmaiAiDWYi%2Bx0w%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AdMPB7RfUpARyq45Oa09tFfmhd7VH%3DBzmaiAiDWYi%2Bx0w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Leslie Hawthorn
Director of Developer Relations
http://elastic.co

Other Places to Find Me:
Freenode: lh
Twitter: @lhawthorn
Skype: mebelh
Voice: +31 20 794 7300

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/UQcTOKpQihU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4CA94-9o15zBNvw714aNjwCnHDMM3%3DKMWRZXgWdQPKG%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4CA94-9o15zBNvw714aNjwCnHDMM3%3DKMWRZXgWdQPKG%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANo%2B_AcBiqpWxEu68XU1CNPUnDKbdYe%2BvQH%3DmxAaWe_6yH4ZBA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.