I cant think of a way to achieve this using simple facet query.
Running a facet in type and sending different facet query for each type is
the only solution i could come up with.
Kindly throw in your ideas here.
Didn't you give a +1 to the field-collapsing issue a year ago?
I expect that grouping and field collapsing are the same issue. There is a
non-sharded grouping implementation, but nothing distributed.
Why would you send a facet query for each type? Wouldn't the first query be
a query faceted on type, and then a separate query (multisearch?) for each
facet entry?
I cant think of a way to achieve this using simple facet query.
Running a facet in type and sending different facet query for each type is
the only solution i could come up with.
Kindly throw in your ideas here.
I expect that grouping and field collapsing are the same issue. There is a
non-sharded grouping implementation, but nothing distributed.
Why would you send a facet query for each type? Wouldn't the first query
be a query faceted on type, and then a separate query (multisearch?) for
each facet entry?
I cant think of a way to achieve this using simple facet query.
Running a facet in type and sending different facet query for each type
is the only solution i could come up with.
Kindly throw in your ideas here.
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.