I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }
but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using the
curl command and also the HEAD plugin).
Thanks,
Ali
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }
but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using the
curl command and also the HEAD plugin).
Thanks,
Ali
See Elasticsearch Platform — Find real-time answers at scale | Elastic
David
Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr
Le 27 mars 2012 à 03:47, Ali Loghmani loghmani@gmail.com a écrit :
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).
Thanks,
Ali
cool, easy
On Monday, March 26, 2012 6:47:53 PM UTC-7, Ali Loghmani wrote:
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using
the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).Thanks,
Ali
Mmm, wondering if we can do that automatically and translate term query /
filter against null to missing one where applicable. Can you open an issue?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Ali Loghmani loghmani@gmail.com wrote:
cool, easy
On Monday, March 26, 2012 6:47:53 PM UTC-7, Ali Loghmani wrote:
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using
the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).Thanks,
Ali
Aren't {"x": "blah", "y": null}, AND, {"x": "blah"} two different
JSON obejcts ? Shouldn't a json document with a field having value
null should be treated differently then a json document which is
missing the field all together ?
It seems that elasticsearch's "missing" filter treats json value
"null" as equivalent to absence of field. Is this the desired
behavior ?
On Mar 28, 3:31 am, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmm, wondering if we can do that automatically and translate term query /
filter against null to missing one where applicable. Can you open an issue?On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Ali Loghmani loghm...@gmail.com wrote:
cool, easy
On Monday, March 26, 2012 6:47:53 PM UTC-7, Ali Loghmani wrote:
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using
the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).Thanks,
Ali
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 18:36 -0700, Anurag Biyani wrote:
Aren't {"x": "blah", "y": null}, AND, {"x": "blah"} two different
JSON obejcts ? Shouldn't a json document with a field having value
null should be treated differently then a json document which is
missing the field all together ?
It seems that elasticsearch's "missing" filter treats json value
"null" as equivalent to absence of field. Is this the desired
behavior ?
From a programmer's perspective, yes, they are different. From ES'
perspective, they aren't.
You could work around this by providing a null_value setting in the
mapping which would be indexed when the property is provided but has a
null value.
That, of course, assumes that the value you choose for the null_value
could never occur as a real value for that property
clint
On Mar 28, 3:31 am, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmm, wondering if we can do that automatically and translate term query /
filter against null to missing one where applicable. Can you open an issue?On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Ali Loghmani loghm...@gmail.com wrote:
cool, easy
On Monday, March 26, 2012 6:47:53 PM UTC-7, Ali Loghmani wrote:
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using
the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).Thanks,
Ali
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Apr 13, 3:30 am, Clinton Gormley cl...@traveljury.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 18:36 -0700,AnuragBiyaniwrote:
Aren't {"x": "blah", "y": null}, AND, {"x": "blah"} two different
JSON obejcts ? Shouldn't a json document with a field having value
null should be treated differently then a json document which is
missing the field all together ?
It seems that elasticsearch's "missing" filter treats json value
"null" as equivalent to absence of field. Is this the desired
behavior ?From a programmer's perspective, yes, they are different. From ES'
perspective, they aren't.You could work around this by providing a null_value setting in the
mapping which would be indexed when the property is provided but has a
null value.That, of course, assumes that the value you choose for the null_value
could never occur as a real value for that propertyclint
On Mar 28, 3:31 am, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmm, wondering if we can do that automatically and translate term query /
filter against null to missing one where applicable. Can you open an issue?On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Ali Loghmani loghm...@gmail.com wrote:
cool, easy
On Monday, March 26, 2012 6:47:53 PM UTC-7, Ali Loghmani wrote:
I am trying to run a query like below:
{"query" : {"term" : { "my_field": null } } }but it seems that it is not working, it does not return anything (using
the curl command and also the HEAD plugin).Thanks,
Ali
© 2020. All Rights Reserved - Elasticsearch
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant logo are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.