As I can see, when I use index aliases with specified routing, everything
works fine (indexing and searching), but _update does not follow the
routing setting from the alias. Is that ok or there is something wrong at
my end ? If this is not right behavior I will give an example here.
As I can see, when I use index aliases with specified routing, everything
works fine (indexing and searching), but _update does not follow the
routing setting from the alias. Is that ok or there is something wrong at
my end ? If this is not right behavior I will give an example here.
I mean the part about extracting huge users to separated indexes in "Users"
data flow section. Hardcoding routing parameter for every _update in
applications makes it imposible split extracted huge user to separated
index into more than one shard.
As I can see, when I use index aliases with specified routing, everything
works fine (indexing and searching), but _update does not follow the
routing setting from the alias. Is that ok or there is something wrong at
my end ? If this is not right behavior I will give an example here.
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.