Benoit
(Benoît)
November 7, 2012, 3:48pm
1
Hi all,
I've seen on this message
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elasticsearch/HESISfuupyc/wQJGiPJeZOcJ that
multi_match field parameter support to boost field with a syntax like
QueryString : field^2
It's pretty useful, but the match query does not support this notation.
Following doesn't work :
{
"match" : {
"message^2" : "this is a test"
}
}
The easiest solution is to use multi_match query even if I know that I search only one field ... is there any drawback with this solution ?
Regards.
Benoît
--
Benoit
(Benoît)
November 7, 2012, 5:09pm
2
Answering partially to myself, this gist
relevance.sh · GitHub mentionned in another thread
show boost parameter in match query.
Benoît
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 4:48:24 PM UTC+1, Benoît wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen on this message
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elasticsearch/HESISfuupyc/wQJGiPJeZOcJthat multi_match field parameter support to boost field with a syntax like
QueryString : field^2
It's pretty useful, but the match query does not support this notation.
Following doesn't work :
{
"match" : {
"message^2" : "this is a test"
}
}
The easiest solution is to use multi_match query even if I know that I search only one field ... is there any drawback with this solution ?
Regards.
Benoît
--
mvg
(Martijn Van Groningen)
November 8, 2012, 2:03pm
3
All queries support the boost
parameter in the query dsl to boost
individual queries.
Martijn
On 7 November 2012 18:09, Benoît benoit.intrw@gmail.com wrote:
Answering partially to myself, this gist
relevance.sh · GitHub mentionned in another thread
show boost parameter in match query.
Benoît
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 4:48:24 PM UTC+1, Benoît wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen on this message
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elasticsearch/HESISfuupyc/wQJGiPJeZOcJ that
multi_match field parameter support to boost field with a syntax like
QueryString : field^2
It's pretty useful, but the match query does not support this notation.
Following doesn't work :
{
"match" : {
"message^2" : "this is a test"
}
}
The easiest solution is to use multi_match query even if I know that I
search only one field ... is there any drawback with this solution ?
Regards.
Benoît
--
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
--