Notice that i added most of my Java code which explains how i build my
query, and also an unit test of the result (i hope it will help others)
Is there a simple way to get highlights when using a multi_field?
The pain is:
I need to use a boolean/text search on these 3 fields
I need to store=yes for all of them or i can't get the highlights from
searches which match thanks to a field with store=false
I need to add highlights for the 3 fields or i only get the highlights
when it was matched by the field analyzer
My highlight map has now 3 fields and i must select/merge the most
appropriate one (exact match > stemming > ngrams for me)
What is the effect of using store=yes on each subfield? Is the original
field going to be stored 3 times and take useless space???
Isn't there a way to build simpler queries just on the multi_field instead
of including all the subfields in my queries?
And to have highlights merged automatically?
For exemple if we have a match against 2 fields "stemmer" + "ngrams", is
there an option to have something like "i want the biggest/smaller
highlight for a field"
For exemple, on a search "descript":
Ngrams (4->8) will match on "descript" and produce "descript" highlight
Stemming will match on description stemmed to "descript" and produce
"description" highlight"
It seems nice because we can use many analyzers for a single field, and
thus i guess have to query only 1 field, ask for 1 highlight, and use
store=yes on one field, but bypassing multi_field.
But before using it, can someone tell me if i'm doing something wrong or is
it that complicated to query against a multi_field?
Thanks
On Thursday, July 5, 2012 6:36:48 PM UTC+2, Sébastien Lorber wrote:
Notice that i added most of my Java code which explains how i build my
query, and also an unit test of the result (i hope it will help others)
Is there a simple way to get highlights when using a multi_field?
The pain is:
I need to use a boolean/text search on these 3 fields
I need to store=yes for all of them or i can't get the highlights
from searches which match thanks to a field with store=false
I need to add highlights for the 3 fields or i only get the
highlights when it was matched by the field analyzer
My highlight map has now 3 fields and i must select/merge the most
appropriate one (exact match > stemming > ngrams for me)
What is the effect of using store=yes on each subfield? Is the original
field going to be stored 3 times and take useless space???
Isn't there a way to build simpler queries just on the multi_field instead
of including all the subfields in my queries?
And to have highlights merged automatically?
For exemple if we have a match against 2 fields "stemmer" + "ngrams", is
there an option to have something like "i want the biggest/smaller
highlight for a field"
For exemple, on a search "descript":
Ngrams (4->8) will match on "descript" and produce "descript" highlight
Stemming will match on description stemmed to "descript" and produce
"description" highlight"
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.