Reindex vs Split Speed and Storage Requirements

[zalseryani (Zeid ALSeryani)]

I have seen a previous topic discussing the difference in speed between reindexing and splitting for an index Reindex vs Split index speeds

• if splitting is much faster than reindexing since it is hard-linking the underlying files of the index, why does splitting need 3 - 4 times of storage when it is using the hard links ?

I appreciate your time and support.

[DavidTurner]

The hard-linking phase makes starting up the split shards fast, but the resulting shards contain all the docs from all the other shards too, in a deleted state, but those deleted docs make them a little inefficient at first. Once the shards have been started, a background merge addresses this by rewriting the shard contents in a more efficient form, removing all the deleted docs. While the merge is ongoing it must hold on disk both the old unmerged (hard-linked) data and the new (rewritten) data, plus various temporary files, and in extreme cases this can temporarily need some multiple of the original shard size. Often it doesn't.