I’m implementing a faceted interface that requires that all the facets be
filtered by a shared filter - below is roughly how the queries currently
look, is there a more efficient/performant way to make this kind of query?
Less fussed about actual query verbosity but if there some way of sharing
or referencing the repeated facet_filter other than search templates that’d
be fantastic.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is the property of CrowdStrike. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network.
The filtered query will filter documents before the query. Facets work on
the documents returned by the query, so if the documents are pre-filtered,
the facets will not even work on them.
I'm implementing a faceted interface that requires that all the facets be
filtered by a shared filter - below is roughly how the queries currently
look, is there a more efficient/performant way to make this kind of query?
Less fussed about actual query verbosity but if there some way of sharing
or referencing the repeated facet_filter other than search templates that'd
be fantastic.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is the property of CrowdStrike. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network.
The filtered query will filter documents before the query. Facets work on
the documents returned by the query, so if the documents are pre-filtered,
the facets will not even work on them.
I’m implementing a faceted interface that requires that all the facets be
filtered by a shared filter - below is roughly how the queries currently
look, is there a more efficient/performant way to make this kind of query?
Less fussed about actual query verbosity but if there some way of sharing
or referencing the repeated facet_filter other than search templates that’d
be fantastic.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is the property of CrowdStrike. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is the property of CrowdStrike. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network.
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.