Hi,
I am using filters to get a result which I sort by field A and then
limit with size. What I would like is to do is to sort the result by
field B. Is that possible? Both fields (A and B) have the type long.
Thanks
Valentin
Hi,
I am using filters to get a result which I sort by field A and then
limit with size. What I would like is to do is to sort the result by
field B. Is that possible? Both fields (A and B) have the type long.
Thanks
Valentin
Yea, just sort on B instead of A, or are you asking if you can sort on
both? If so, then yes, just have both fields in the sorting part.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Valentin pletzer@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using filters to get a result which I sort by field A and then
limit with size. What I would like is to do is to sort the result by
field B. Is that possible? Both fields (A and B) have the type long.Thanks
Valentin
Sorry. I didnt explain it well it enough. What I want is to sort only
the resulting 10 records by field B.
On Jan 20, 4:02 pm, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
Yea, just sort on B instead of A, or are you asking if you can sort on
both? If so, then yes, just have both fields in the sorting part.On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Valentin plet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using filters to get a result which I sort by field A and then
limit with size. What I would like is to do is to sort the result by
field B. Is that possible? Both fields (A and B) have the type long.Thanks
Valentin
why not sort them in-memory on your own? it shouldn't make a
difference
Peter.
© 2020. All Rights Reserved - Elasticsearch
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant logo are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.