Terms Facet broken in 0.9RC1. Reproduceable example attached

0.9 fails to count missing values when faceting on a numeric field. If some
records are missing the value, they will not be accounted for in facet's
"missing" field. faceting on string field seems to work fine
It worked fine in 0.2.x

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Another issue is that setting facet size to 0 returns no facets rather than
all of them

On Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:36:48 PM UTC-4, AlexR wrote:

0.9 fails to count missing values when faceting on a numeric field. If
some records are missing the value, they will not be accounted for in
facet's "missing" field. faceting on string field seems to work fine
It worked fine in 0.2.x

https://gist.github.com/roytmana/5215441

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

I created issue on
github https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/2807

On Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:36:48 PM UTC-4, AlexR wrote:

0.9 fails to count missing values when faceting on a numeric field. If
some records are missing the value, they will not be accounted for in
facet's "missing" field. faceting on string field seems to work fine
It worked fine in 0.2.x

https://gist.github.com/roytmana/5215441

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.