From this article
I know pulsing codec saves one disk seek hence introduces performance gain.
I would like to know what I pay for using pulsing codec? What will happen
if I give it a high cut-off frequency so that all postings are stored in
In other words, instead of the goodness, I would like to know what is the
drawback of using pulsing postings format?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to email@example.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/4d4c5ad8-baab-4c81-85a5-dc75095a7f5a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.