Why are 3 zones less expensive than 2 zones?

Why is tiebreaker only needed in a 2 zone setup?

Pricing for 2 zones:

Pricing for 3 zones:

Because if the nodes lose contact with each other they could form their own cluster - aka split brain.

But 3 nodes means as long as 2 are connected you have a majority.

In recent versions this is not the case. The reason a tiebreaker is needed is that you need to have 3 master eligible nodes in order to be able to allow the cluster to operate even if one node goes down. If you only have 2 nodes both need to be available for the cluster to operate (majority of 3 is 2, majority of 2 is also 2).

The reason 3 zones are cheaper seems to be that the tiebreaker is more expensive than one of your data nodes even though it is smaller. I wonder if this is because deploying across 3 availability zones is better and they are encouraging this best practice through pricing as it leads to less support issues.

1 Like

Yep, good point.

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.