When faceting on boolean field by default ES uses T and F for values. I
would prefer Yes, No, N/A (when it is blank) but I do not want to pollute
my source json substituting boolean for Yes, No, N/A string and then having
to deal with the text when consuming source data. (there are quite a few of
boolean fields I need to support) Of course I can have my UI translate T
and F to and from Yes, No, N/A but it woul dbe nice if I did not have to do
it plus I want to be able to facet/filter on N/A for missing true/false
values which plain faceting on boolean won't do (well it will give me
missing but filtering on it will require filtering on not(true or false)).
I was wondering if there is an elegant solution for it with multifield
mapping. I know it could solve n/a issue since mapping allows to specify
default value for empty json properties but I will need to change mapping
from boolean to string and I do not know how to translate boolean to Yes,
No, N/A. Use scripting?
When faceting on boolean field by default ES uses T and F for values. I would prefer Yes, No, N/A (when it is blank) but I do not want to pollute my source json substituting boolean for Yes, No, N/A string and then having to deal with the text when consuming source data. (there are quite a few of boolean fields I need to support) Of course I can have my UI translate T and F to and from Yes, No, N/A but it woul dbe nice if I did not have to do it plus I want to be able to facet/filter on N/A for missing true/false values which plain faceting on boolean won't do (well it will give me missing but filtering on it will require filtering on not(true or false)). I was wondering if there is an elegant solution for it with multifield mapping. I know it could solve n/a issue since mapping allows to specify default value for empty json properties but I will need to change mapping from boolean to string and I do not know how to translate boolean to Yes, No, N/A. Use scripting?
As far as needing to facet on true/false/null what's the typical approach?
use facet._missing for count and "not include true and false" filter?
Is there a better technique of filtering on missing/null values in case of
boolean in in general case of string tokens?
Thank you,
Alex
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:06:42 AM UTC-5, Kay Röpke wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013, at 2:25 AM, AlexR <royt...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
wrote:
Helllo,
When faceting on boolean field by default ES uses T and F for values. I
would prefer Yes, No, N/A (when it is blank) but I do not want to pollute
my source json substituting boolean for Yes, No, N/A string and then having
to deal with the text when consuming source data. (there are quite a few of
boolean fields I need to support) Of course I can have my UI translate T
and F to and from Yes, No, N/A but it woul dbe nice if I did not have to do
it plus I want to be able to facet/filter on N/A for missing true/false
values which plain faceting on boolean won't do (well it will give me
missing but filtering on it will require filtering on not(true or false)).
I was wondering if there is an elegant solution for it with multifield
mapping. I know it could solve n/a issue since mapping allows to specify
default value for empty json properties but I will need to change mapping
from boolean to string and I do not know how to translate boolean to Yes,
No, N/A. Use scripting?
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 11:20:08 AM UTC-5, AlexR wrote:
Thanks Kay,
As far as needing to facet on true/false/null what's the typical approach?
use facet._missing for count and "not include true and false" filter?
Is there a better technique of filtering on missing/null values in case of
boolean in in general case of string tokens?
Thank you,
Alex
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:06:42 AM UTC-5, Kay Röpke wrote:
When faceting on boolean field by default ES uses T and F for values. I
would prefer Yes, No, N/A (when it is blank) but I do not want to pollute
my source json substituting boolean for Yes, No, N/A string and then having
to deal with the text when consuming source data. (there are quite a few of
boolean fields I need to support) Of course I can have my UI translate T
and F to and from Yes, No, N/A but it woul dbe nice if I did not have to do
it plus I want to be able to facet/filter on N/A for missing true/false
values which plain faceting on boolean won't do (well it will give me
missing but filtering on it will require filtering on not(true or false)).
I was wondering if there is an elegant solution for it with multifield
mapping. I know it could solve n/a issue since mapping allows to specify
default value for empty json properties but I will need to change mapping
from boolean to string and I do not know how to translate boolean to Yes,
No, N/A. Use scripting?
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.