Elastics mapping

Elastic Stack Elasticsearch
1

I want to create mapping but can anyone clear me what is "search_result_data" and "search_data". So it will be best way to define mapping or not.

Thank you.

2

Where are you seeing this?

3

https://project-a.github.io/on-site-search-design-patterns-for-e-commerce/#multi-term-auto-completion

I saw this here....Kindly tell is this possible...

Thank you.

4

That looks like the document they are sending to Elasticsearch.

5

Yes Mark...They are doing mapping....I want to know this type of keyword supported by elastic now...or benefits of this...bcz I did mapping like below

"mappings": {
"product": {
"_all": {
"analyzer": "index_nGram_analyzer",
"search_analyzer": "searchText_analyzer",
"search_quote_analyzer":"index_nGram_analyzer"

     },
     "properties": {
        "title": {
           "type": "text",
           "include_in_all": true
        },
        "brand": {
           "type": "text",
           
		   "include_in_all": true
        },
        "category": {
           "type": "text",
           
		   "include_in_all": true
        },
        "boostedterm": {
           "type": "text",
           "include_in_all": true
        },
        "ram": {
           "type": "integer",
          
           "include_in_all": false
           
        },
		"rom": {
           "type": "integer",
          
           "include_in_all": false
        },
		"color": {
           "type": "text",
           
           "include_in_all": false
        },
		"site": {
           "type": "integer",
         
           "include_in_all": false
        },
        "price": {
           "type": "float",
		   
           "include_in_all": false
        }

Or can we also create like that ...if it beneficial or not..

6

Beneficial for what?
It's not really clear what you are trying to do here sorry.

7

I did mapping...where I define three analyzer settings and using that name here in mapping...In mapping I define there data type and either they have to do analyze or not. So I just want to know my mapping is right or not. Bcz when I saw that link mapping...they define some other way..they are using facet which is now agg word..I think....so can u just tell me...my mapping is correct or not. Or any benefit if I will define like that.

8

Again, right for what? If your use case exactly the same as theirs?

9

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.