Is it possible to use ILM policy to the transform index result?
I tried to the transform index and added alias into it, but the ILM not works as expected for transform indices.
Is there any workaround to do this?
Regards,
Fadjar340
Is it possible to use ILM policy to the transform index result?
I tried to the transform index and added alias into it, but the ILM not works as expected for transform indices.
Is there any workaround to do this?
Regards,
Fadjar340
Hi,
please have a look into limitations.
ILM on the destination index may cause unexpected problems, because transform updates/overwrites documents. For example a rollover can lead to duplicates, see this issue.
As pointed out in limitations, consider using date index name processor to get ILM-like behavior if your transform contains a date_histogram
.
Having that said, nobody prevents you from using ILM on the destination index, it just has the mentioned side-effects. You may be able to work-around them in your application (e.g. collapsing dups).
Transform can write to aliases including a write alias. This seems like a bug or a misconfiguration of ILM. If you share more information (repro steps) we might be able to help.
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
© 2020. All Rights Reserved - Elasticsearch
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant logo are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.