I have a question related to metrics collection. The application writes metric data into a file. Can filebeat pickup this information say using log or filestream input and send it to elasticsearch ? What would be the difference in this case compared to running metribeat to collect this information ?
Assuming the metrics are written in a structured format in the log file, you can certainly use Filebeat to pick them up and parse them into JSON documents for Elasticsearch to index.
Metricbeat is best for applications with well-known metrics formats, e.g. apache, kafka, mysql, etc. However, you can use it to monitor custom application metrics via something like the
http.json metricset (which periodically pulls metrics from your application's HTTP endpoint serving JSON) or the
http.server metricset (which allows your application to push JSON-formatted metrics documents to Metricbeat).
Now, to consider the tradeoffs between using Filebeat to read structured metrics from log files vs. using the
http.json metricset vs. using the
- With the
http.jsonmetricset, Metricbeat will periodically pull metrics from your application. This has two implications:
- If your application's endpoint is occasionally unreachable for some reason or times out, the metrics during that collection instance will be lost.
- If your application's metrics, particularly gauge metrics, change drastically between two collection instances, those intermediate metrics will never be collected.
- With the
http.servermetricset, your application is in control of when to push metrics to Metricbeat so both the disadvantages mentioned above largely go away. However, you could still run into one disadvantage:
- If Metricbeat is occasionally unreachable for some reason, metrics sent during this period might be lost, unless your application implements some kind of retry logic.
- With the Filebeat approach using the
filestreaminput, your application should be writing logs to a local filesystem and Filebeat should be reading from the same local filesystem. This removes any network-related disadvantages mentioned above. Also, the file acts as a natural buffer, in case Filebeat needs to be restarted for some reason. And your application still gets to control how often to emit metrics to the file, which is good. The only disadvantage as such that you run into is:
- you are now limited by the amount of disk space. But this can also be managed by setting up log rotation on your log files. Filebeat does not perform log rotation but it is able to handle log files that are rotated.
Hope that helps,
Thanks Shaunak for the details explanation. Appreciate your inputs. Will try out your suggestion
My application is using dropwizard to collect metrics and writes to log file. In this case what should be the filebeat config to indicate that it's sending metrics and not just logs ?
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.