What is the difference in performance or additional load on ElasticSearch
if I define an index with 50 shards or I define 50 indices with one shard.
I mean, technically, there are blogs that suggest that these are
equivalent? Of course without the shard rebalancing, replica, failover, etc.
But, performance-wise, if I am to do 50 indices with one shard, and
aggregate results from all 50, will I see a degradation in performance
compared to 1 index with 50 shards?
What is the difference in performance or additional load on Elasticsearch
if I define an index with 50 shards or I define 50 indices with one shard.
I mean, technically, there are blogs that suggest that these are
equivalent? Of course without the shard rebalancing, replica, failover, etc.
But, performance-wise, if I am to do 50 indices with one shard, and
aggregate results from all 50, will I see a degradation in performance
compared to 1 index with 50 shards?
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.