Optimal settings / Computer specifications

Elastic Stack Elasticsearch
1

Hi!

I am new at elastic stack, I have installed Filebeat in around 15 servers (15 diferent computers (some Windows some Linux)) to get Tomcat logs and JMX data.

I have installed in another computer (Linux), Logstash (to create elasticsearch indexes for those logs/JMX data), Elasticsearch to keep and make queries of that data, and Kibana.
The hardware specifications of this Logstash/ElasticSearch/Kibana computer are as follow:
Number of processing units: 2
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 2
Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
cpu MHz : 2199.998
cache size : 56320 KB

I have 1 GB RAM memory assigned to Elasticsearch

What Kibana tells me I have in Elasticsearch:

Overview Version 6.3.0
Uptime 4 hours

Nodes: 1
Disk Available 79.25% 118.8 GB / 149.9 GB
JVM Heap 66.47% 1.3 GB / 2.0 GB

Indices: 247
Documents 64,935,866
Disk Usage 27.2 GB
Primary Shards 1,067
Replica Shards 0

What Kibana tells me I have in Logstash:

Overview
Events Received 4.9m
Events Emitted 4.9m

Nodes: 1
Uptime 3 days
JVM Heap 54.57% 263.8 MB / 483.4 MB

Pipelines: 1
With Memory Queues 1
With Persistent Queues 0

What Kibana tells me I have in Beats:

Beats: 23
Filebeat 23

When I execute a "top" command in the logstash/elasticsearch/kibana computer I get:

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
XXXXXX beat 20 0 30.8G 1.9g 16372 S 98.2 50.5 197:25.77 java

If I stop elasticsearcg service, that process stops, so it is elasticsearch who is consuming so much virtual memory and processor. %CPU varies between 20% and 170%, it is most of the time bellow 100%

Now the question, do I need a more powerfull computer, just more memory, or just a change in my configuration files?

Thanks a lot in advance!!

2

You have far too many indices and shards given the size of the cluster and data. Please have a look at this blog post and try to reduce that significantly.

3

Thank you so much!!!

I see, I should have a shard for about 20-40 GB of data. I think I am not going to get as much as 20 GB per index ever, I have one index for each log file and month.
I delete indices which age is older than 4 months. I am saving logs of about 60 files, in about 15 diferent servers.

What would be your advice? Shouldn't I keep all 250 indices with 1 shard each? Should I get just a few indices with 1 or more shards in order to get as much as 20-40 GB per shard? It is a lot easier for me to keep an index per log file.

Thanks a lot!!!

4

That sounds very inefficient. Try to use as few indices as possible by using monthly indices with a single primary shards containing as many sources as you can without introducing mapping conflicts.

5

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.