Problem with put mapping on multiple indices


(Mustafa Sener) #1

Hi,
I tested put mapping on all indices using transport client but it does not
work in version 0.15. It was working in previous versions (0.14.x). Is this
feature deprecated?

--
Mustafa Sener
www.ifountain.com


(Clinton Gormley) #2

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:42 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

Hi,
I tested put mapping on all indices using transport client but it does
not work in version 0.15. It was working in previous versions
(0.14.x). Is this feature deprecated?

Why do you think this doesn't work?

This gist shows that it does: https://gist.github.com/840245

clint


(Mustafa Sener) #3

In the gist you sent me acknowledged part in create mapping response is
false. I got the same response in my automated test. Why does this return
acknowledged false? In previous ES versions it was true.

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Clinton Gormley
clinton@iannounce.co.ukwrote:

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:42 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

Hi,
I tested put mapping on all indices using transport client but it does
not work in version 0.15. It was working in previous versions
(0.14.x). Is this feature deprecated?

Why do you think this doesn't work?

This gist shows that it does: https://gist.github.com/840245

clint

--
Mustafa Sener
www.ifountain.com


(Clinton Gormley) #4

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:46 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

In the gist you sent me acknowledged part in create mapping response
is false. I got the same response in my automated test. Why does this
return acknowledged false? In previous ES versions it was true.

Ah OK - I don't know what that changed, but I'm guessing it is to do
with this commit:

Have to wait for kimchy to comment

clint


(Shay Banon) #5

Can you open an issue for this? The fact that it was not ack'ed does not mean that its not there.
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Clinton Gormley wrote:

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:46 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

In the gist you sent me acknowledged part in create mapping response
is false. I got the same response in my automated test. Why does this
return acknowledged false? In previous ES versions it was true.

Ah OK - I don't know what that changed, but I'm guessing it is to do
with this commit:

https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/commits/2381f668f8962412d223ce1ac41dcb61a60339d6

Have to wait for kimchy to comment

clint


(Mustafa Sener) #6

I created issue


Thanks...

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Shay Banon shay.banon@elasticsearch.comwrote:

Can you open an issue for this? The fact that it was not ack'ed does not
mean that its not there.

On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Clinton Gormley wrote:

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:46 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

In the gist you sent me acknowledged part in create mapping response
is false. I got the same response in my automated test. Why does this
return acknowledged false? In previous ES versions it was true.

Ah OK - I don't know what that changed, but I'm guessing it is to do
with this commit:

https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/commits/2381f668f8962412d223ce1ac41dcb61a60339d6

Have to wait for kimchy to comment

clint

--
Mustafa Sener
www.ifountain.com


(Shay Banon) #7

cool, thanks!, a fix is on the way :slight_smile:
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Mustafa Sener wrote:

I created issue
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/720
Thanks...

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Shay Banon shay.banon@elasticsearch.com wrote:

Can you open an issue for this? The fact that it was not ack'ed does not mean that its not there.
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Clinton Gormley wrote:

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:46 +0200, Mustafa Sener wrote:

In the gist you sent me acknowledged part in create mapping response
is false. I got the same response in my automated test. Why does this
return acknowledged false? In previous ES versions it was true.

Ah OK - I don't know what that changed, but I'm guessing it is to do
with this commit:

https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/commits/2381f668f8962412d223ce1ac41dcb61a60339d6

Have to wait for kimchy to comment

clint

--
Mustafa Sener
www.ifountain.com


(system) #8